Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31101906›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2019

Induction of neoantigen-reactive T cells from healthy donors.

Muhammad Ali, Zsofia Foldvari, Eirini Giannakopoulou, Maxi-Lu Böschen, Erlend Strønen, Weiwen Yang, Mireille Toebes, Benjamin Schubert, Oliver Kohlbacher, Ton N Schumacher and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Molecular origin, discovery, validation and application of neoantigens.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Muhammad Ali *Department of Cancer Immunology, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Zsofia Foldvari *Department of Cancer Immunology, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Eirini Giannakopoulou *Department of Cancer Immunology, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Maxi-Lu BöschenDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Erlend StrønenDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Weiwen YangDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Mireille ToebesDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Benjamin SchubertInstitute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Oliver KohlbacherInstitute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ton N SchumacherDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Johanna OlweusDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway. johanna.olweus@medisin.uio.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of immunogenic neoantigens and their cognate T cells represents the most crucial and rate-limiting steps in the development of personalized cancer immunotherapies that are based on vaccination or on infusion of T cell receptor (TCR)-engineered T cells. Recent advances in deep-sequencing technologies and in silico prediction algorithms have allowed rapid identification of candidate neoepitopes. However, large-scale validation of putative neoepitopes and the isolation of reactive T cells are challenging because of the limited availablity of patient material and the low frequencies of neoepitope-specific T cells. Here we describe a standardized protocol for the induction of neoepitope-reactive T cells from healthy donor T cell repertoires, unaffected by the potentially immunosuppressive environment of the tumor-bearing host. Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs) transfected with mRNA encoding candidate neoepitopes are used to prime autologous naive CD8

Indexed as

CD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCells, CulturedDendritic CellsElectroporationEpitopesHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellRNA, MessengerTransfectionEpitopesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.