Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31101896›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2019

Prostate cancer in sexual minorities and the influence of HIV status.

Channa Amarasekera, Vincent Wong, Emily Yura, Adarsh Manjunath, Edward Schaeffer, Shilajit Kundu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. It's time to take Pride in our field.Nature reviews. Urology · 2021
    Article
  12. Prostate cancer and sexual consequences among men who have sex with men.International journal of impotence research · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. MCM3AP-AS1: An Indispensable Cancer-Related LncRNA.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Channa AmarasekeraDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. channa.amarasekera@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5214-0329
Vincent WongDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Emily YuraDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7705-9076
Adarsh ManjunathDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Edward SchaefferDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Shilajit KunduDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in men in the USA, but the effect of prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment on men in a sexual minority group, including men who have sex with men and transgender women, is poorly understood. Efforts to study this population are complicated, as cancer registries do not routinely collect information on sexual orientation. As a result, epidemiological data regarding this population have come from small studies that have included disparate rates of prostate cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment. Qualitative studies indicate that prostate cancer is experienced differently by sexual minorities, with distinct health-care needs that arise owing to differences in sexual practices, social support systems and relationships with the medical community. Notably, sexual minorities have been reported to experience poorer health-related quality of life outcomes than heterosexual men, and tend to have less robust social support systems, experience increased psychological distress caused by sexual dysfunction (areas of which are unmeasured after treatment), experience isolation within the health-care system and express increased levels of dissatisfaction with treatment. The incidence of prostate cancer actually seems to be decreased in men from sexual minorities living with HIV, despite there being no differences in screening and treatment, with poor cancer-specific mortality. Although the literature on patients with prostate cancer in men from sexual minority groups has historically been sparse, peer-reviewed research in this area has grown considerably during the past decade and has become an important field of study.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsProstatic NeoplasmsSexual and Gender MinoritiesForecastingHumansMaleQuality of LifeSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID31101896
OpenAlexW2945507505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.