ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2019
Short term outcomes in term and late preterm neonates admitted to the well-baby nursery after resuscitation in the delivery room.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short- and Long-Term Consequences of Late-Preterm and Early-Term Birth.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Outcomes after delivery room positive pressure ventilation in late preterm and term infants.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Oxygen saturation and heart rate in healthy term and late preterm infants with delayed cord clamping.Pediatric research · 2024Review
- What happens to 35 week infants that receive delivery room continuous positive airway pressure?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the risk for deterioration in well-baby nursery (WBN) admissions after resuscitation. STUDY
designA single center retrospective study (2015-2016) of 370 resuscitated WBN admissions.
resultsOf the 11,307 admissions, 3.27% received resuscitation with 183 receiving continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) alone and 187 receiving positive pressure ventilation (PPV) ± CPAP. Resuscitated neonates were more frequently transferred to the NICU (11.6 versus 3.9%, p < 0.001) compared to those without resuscitation. More neonates requiring CPAP alone were transferred to the NICU compared to those requiring PPV ± CPAP (15.85 versus 7.49%, p = 0.01). Univariate risk ratios for transfer were elevated for CPAP alone and lower gestational age categories. Multivariate regression analyses demonstrated increased transfer risk across gestational age categories only.
conclusionsNeonates admitted to the WBN after delivery room resuscitation are at increased risk for NICU transfer compared to those without resuscitation. This study supports the recommendation for post-resuscitation care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31101848What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.