Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31101596›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2019

Skin cancer detection by deep learning and sound analysis algorithms: A prospective clinical study of an elementary dermoscope.

A Dascalu, E O David

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03362138 unknown statusnot on this map

Dermoscopy Evaluation of Pigmented Skin Lesions by a Neuronal Network Clinical Decision Support: an Open Prospective Non Interventional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAssuta Hospital SystemsRan2017 to 2019Enrolled80ConditionsMelanoma, Pigmented Skin Lesion, Dysplastic NeviArmsdermoscopy
NCT05689437 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

MIRA Clinical Learning Environment (MIRACLE): Lung

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2022 to 2023Enrolled1,000ConditionsLung CancerArmsApplication of ILD prediction machine learning model to planning imaging, Routine, automatic presentation of ILD risk level for evaluation by the clinician., Application of SGR machine learning model to diagnostic and planning imaging, Routine estimation of tumor specific growth rate (SGR) for lesions being considered for radiation therapy presented to clinician., Application of CBCT machine learning model to on-treatment imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Deep Learning Based Classification of Dermatological Disorders.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A DascaluDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Electronic address: dasc@tauex.tau.ac.il.
E O DavidDepartment of Computer Science, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Bar-Ilan University · ILTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin cancer (SC), especially melanoma, is a growing public health burden. Experimental studies have indicated a potential diagnostic role for deep learning (DL) algorithms in identifying SC at varying sensitivities. Previously, it was demonstrated that diagnostics by dermoscopy are improved by applying an additional sonification (data to sound waves conversion) layer on DL algorithms. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of image quality on accuracy of diagnosis by sonification employing a rudimentary skin magnifier with polarized light (SMP).

methodsDermoscopy images acquired by SMP were processed by a first deep learning algorithm and sonified. Audio output was further analyzed by a different secondary DL. Study criteria outcomes of SMP were specificity and sensitivity, which were further processed by a F2-score, i.e. applying a twice extra weight to sensitivity over positive predictive values.

findingsPatients (n = 73) fulfilling inclusion criteria were referred to biopsy. SMP analysis metrics resulted in a receiver operator characteristic curve AUC's of 0.814 (95% CI, 0.798-0.831). SMP achieved a F2-score sensitivity of 91.7%, specificity of 41.8% and positive predictive value of 57.3%. Diagnosing the same set of patients' lesions by an advanced dermoscope resulted in a F2-score sensitivity of 89.5%, specificity of 57.8% and a positive predictive value of 59.9% (P=NS).

interpretationDL processing of dermoscopic images followed by sonification results in an accurate diagnostic output for SMP, implying that the quality of the dermoscope is not the major factor influencing DL diagnosis of skin cancer. Present system might assist all healthcare providers as a feasible computer-assisted detection system. FUND: Bostel Technologies. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03362138.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningDermoscopyMedical InformaticsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySkin NeoplasmsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDermoscopyMelanomaSkin cancerSonificationTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID31101596
PMCPMC6562065
OpenAlexW2946796433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.