Trial reportThe journal of sexual medicine2019
Clinically Meaningful Change in Sexual Desire in the Psychosexual Daily Questionnaire in Older Men from the TTrials.
Trial report in The journal of sexual medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Testosterone Treatment and Sexual Function in Men: Secondary Analysis of the T4DM (Testosterone for Diabetes) Trial.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Trial
- Daily Oral Administration of the Novel Androgen 11β-MNTDC Markedly Suppresses Serum Gonadotropins in Healthy Men.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2020Trial
- The Effect of Testosterone Replacement on Sexual Function in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The world journal of men's health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA recent study of older men participating in the Testosterone Trials (TTrials) defined a clinically meaningful change in the Psychosexual Daily Questionnaire (PDQ) question 4 in hypogonadal men age ≥65 years. This study defines clinically meaningful change in the same population for sexual desire assessed by PDQ question 1.
aimTo determine a clinically meaningful change in the answers to question 1 of the PDQ in hypogonadal older men.
methodsParticipants in the Sexual Function Trial of the TTrials were randomly divided into a training and test set. Anchor-based methods, including regression analysis, receiver operating characteristic curves, and empirical cumulative distribution functions, were used to determine a clinically meaningful change on question 1 in the training set, and the selected threshold was evaluated in the test set for an effect of testosterone treatment.
resultsA clinically meaningful increase in question 1 of the PDQ was determined to be ≥0.7 points. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Question 1 of the PDQ can be used to assess sexual desire in response to testosterone treatment. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Data were obtained from a single large study of older hypogonadal men.
conclusionClinically meaningful improvement of sexual desire is a change of ≥0.7 in the score of question 1 of the PDQ. Stephens-Shields AJ, Wang C, Preston P, et al. Clinically Meaningful Change in Sexual Desire in the Psychosexual Daily Questionnaire in Older Men from the TTrials. J Sex Med 2019;16:951-953.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.