ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2019
Capillary Hemorrhage Induced by Contrast-Enhanced Diagnostic Ultrasound in Rat Intestine.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- CsInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
- In vivo high-speed microscopy of microbubbles in the chorioallantoic membrane model.Theranostics · 2024Article
- Overview of Ultrasound in Dentistry for Advancing Research Methodology and Patient Care Quality with Emphasis on Periodontal/Peri-implant Applications.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2023Review
- Theranostics in the vasculature: bioeffects of ultrasound and microbubbles to induce vascular shutdown.Theranostics · 2023Review
- Monitoring neonatal brain hemorrhage progression by photoacoustic tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Intravital imaging and cavitation monitoring of antivascular ultrasound in tumor microvasculature.Theranostics · 2023Article
- Recent Progress Toward Imaging Application of Multifunction Sonosensitizers in Sonodynamic Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022Review
- Ultrasound-Targeted Microbubble Destruction Enhances Inhibitory Effect of Apatinib on Angiogenesis in Triple Negative Breast Carcinoma Xenografts.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced diagnostic ultrasound (CEDUS) can lead to microvascular injury and petechial hemorrhage by the cavitational mechanism of ultrasonic bioeffects. Capillary hemorrhage has been noted in the heart and kidney, which are common targets of CEDUS examination. CEDUS has also become useful for monitoring intestinal inflammation. In the 1990s, the risk of intestinal microvascular hemorrhage was investigated both for incidental exposure by lithotripter shockwaves and for contrast agent microbubbles acting as cavitation nuclei with laboratory pulsed ultrasound systems. This study was initiated to update the risk assessment for intestine exposed to diagnostic imaging simulating CEDUS. The abdomens of anesthetized rats were scanned by a 1.6 MHz phased array probe during infusion of microbubble suspensions simulating Definity ultrasound contrast agent. Dual image frames were triggered intermittently, and the output power was varied to assess the exposure response. Petechiae counts in small intestine mucosa and muscle layers increased with increasing trigger interval from 2 s to 10 s, indicative of a slow refill after microbubble destruction. The counts increased with increasing output above a threshold of 1.4 MPa peak rarefactional pressure amplitude. Petechiae were also seen in Peyer's patches, and occult blood was detected in many affected segments of intestine. These results are consistent with early laboratory pulsed-ultrasound results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.