Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31101102›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Disrupting the link between maltreatment and delinquency: how school, family, and community factors can be protective.

Andra Wilkinson, Hannah Lantos, Tyler McDaniel, Hannah Winslow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. What happens next: The lingering effects of child abuse in a Mexican cohort.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andra WilkinsonChild Trends, 7315 Wisconsin Ave, Suite 1200W, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA. awilkinson@childtrends.org.
Hannah LantosChild Trends, 7315 Wisconsin Ave, Suite 1200W, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Tyler McDanielChild Trends, 7315 Wisconsin Ave, Suite 1200W, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Hannah WinslowChild Trends, 7315 Wisconsin Ave, Suite 1200W, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Child Trends · USStanford University · US

Funding

Wave IV Data CollectionP01HD031921 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HARRIS, KATHLEEN MULLAN · 1994 to 2020
$86.1M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD031921Office of Justice Programs 2016-MU-MU-0064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPast experiences of childhood maltreatment are common for youth involved in the juvenile justice system. This paper explores potential protective factors at the peer, family, school, and neighborhood levels that disrupt the relationship between maltreatment and later non-violent and violent offending behavior and how these protective effects vary by a number of different sociodemographics.

methodsWe used data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), a nationally representative longitudinal study of adolescents who were in grades 7-12 in the 1994-95 school year. Pulling data from Add Health respondents from ages 13 to 30, we used linear mixed effects modeling to create growth curves of predicted violent and non-violent offending frequency from adolescence into young adulthood, with maltreatment frequency as a predictor. Next, we tested whether potential protective factors including time with friends, a high-quality relationship with a parent figure, school connection, or neighborhood collective efficacy moderated the intercept or slope of the growth curves. Finally, we tested if sex, race/ethnicity, or sexual orientation moderated these protective effects.

resultsFor violent offending, school connection, high-quality relationships with mother or father figures, and neighborhood collective efficacy were all generally protective, meaning they were associated with lower levels and shallower slopes of predicted violent offending, but they were not more or less protective for those who experienced maltreatment. For non-violent offending, the same was true of school connection, high-quality relationships with a mother figure, and neighborhood collective efficacy, which were all generally protective. We found no evidence of a protective effect for time spent with friends, though this is likely due to measurement constraints, as simply measuring time spent with friends may have heterogeneous effects on delinquent behaviors. We found no evidence that any of these protective effects varied by sociodemographics.

conclusionsThis paper identifies factors that teachers, juvenile corrections officers, policymakers and others can intervene on to prevent engagement (or re-engagement) in delinquency and offending among youth and young adults who experienced maltreatment. As they are also protective for youth who have not experienced maltreatment they also inform general delinquency prevention efforts.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAdultChildChild AbuseCriminalsFemaleHumansJuvenile DelinquencyLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleParent-Child RelationsPeer GroupProtective FactorsResidence CharacteristicsAbuseDelinquencyMaltreatmentNeighborhood collective efficacyNon-violentParental relationship qualityProtective factorsSchool connectionViolent

Identifiers

PMID31101102
PMCPMC6525373
OpenAlexW2947260685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.