Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2019
Comparison of the effect of different degrees of passive leg raising on the internal jugular vein cross-sectional area in patients before thoracic surgery.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of liquid resuscitation guided by internal jugular vein variability during deep inhalation on preventing propofol-induced hypotension in elderly patients.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular internal jugular vein compression to increase internal jugular vein cross-sectional area in hospitalized patients: a prospective observational study in Japan.Acute and critical care · 2025Article
- Ultrasonographic assessment of right internal jugular vein dimensions following passive legs elevation versus hepatic compression: a cross-sectional study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated the effect of different degrees of passive leg raising (PLR) on the internal jugular vein (IJV) cross-sectional area (CSA) and on the success rate of IJV cannulation in patients waiting for thoracic surgery, to analyze whether body mass index (BMI), gender, age, fasting time and preoperative rehydration have any impact on changes in the IJV CSA.
methodsEighty-two patients scheduled for selective thoracic surgery were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned based on a computer-generated randomization sequence into 3 groups: 0, 30, and 50 degrees (n = 32, 25, and 25 patients, respectively). The right IJV CSA in the sequence of 0-degree (supine position), 30-degree and 50-degree PLR positions was recorded in all patients using an ultrasound probe. The relationship of BMI, gender, age, fasting time and preoperative rehydration to the IJV CSA was analyzed. Then, each patient was returned to a supine position. After waiting for at least 5 min, patients were placed in a PLR position at 0, 30, or 50 degrees, and then IJV cannulation was performed without ultrasound guidance. The success rate of IJV catheterization at different PLR angles was compared.
resultsThe average CSA of the right IJV in the supine position, 30-degree PLR position and 50-degree PLR position was 1.39 ± 0.63 cm
conclusionsPLR increases the CSA of the right IJV, especially for patients with long fasting times before thoracic surgery. The effect of the 30-degree PLR position is similar to that of the 50-degree PLR position. However, the success rate of right IJV catheterization was not enhanced in this study using landmark-guided puncture, even though the CSA of the right IJV was increased.
trial registrationClinical trial registration number: ChiCTR1800015051 . Date of registration: March 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.