Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31101060›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2019

System within systems: challenges and opportunities for the Expanded Programme on Immunisation in Pakistan.

Zaeem Haq, Babar Tasneem Shaikh, Nhan Tran, Assad Hafeez, Abdul Ghaffar

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zaeem HaqHealth Services Academy, Chak Shahzad, Park Road, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan. drzaeem@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4656-9879
Babar Tasneem ShaikhHealth Services Academy, Chak Shahzad, Park Road, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Nhan TranAlliance for Health Policy & Systems Research, Geneva, Switzerland.
Assad HafeezHealth Services Academy, Chak Shahzad, Park Road, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Abdul GhaffarAlliance for Health Policy & Systems Research, Geneva, Switzerland.
Health Services Academy · PKAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPakistan has one of the highest infant and child mortality rates in the world, half of these occurring due to vaccine-preventable diseases. The country started its Expanded Programme on immunisation (EPI) in 1978. However, the programme's performance is often questioned, as the Immunisation rates have been chronically low and on-time vaccination unsatisfactory. We explored the programme's insights about its structural and implementation arrangements within the larger governance system, and the ensuing challenges as well as opportunities.

methodsWe carried out a qualitative case study comprised of semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 34 purposively selected key informants from various tiers of immunisation policy and programme implementation. The interviews revolved around WHO's six building blocks of a health system, their interactions with EPI counterparts, and with the outer ecological factors. Interviews were transcribed and content analysed for emergent themes.

resultsThe EPI faces several challenges in delivering routine immunisation (RI) to children, including lack of clarity on whether to provide vaccination through fixed centres or mobile teams, scarcity of human resource at various levels, lack of accurate population data, on-ground logistic issues, lack of a separate budget line for EPI, global pressure for polio, less priority to prevention by the policy, security risks for community-based activities, and community misconceptions about vaccines.

conclusionsThe fulcrum for most of the challenges lies where EPI service delivery interacts with components of the broader health system. The activities for polio eradication have had implications for RI. Socio-political issues from the national and global environment also impact this system. The interplay of these factors, while posing challenges to effective implementation of RI, also brings opportunities for improvement. Collective effort from local, national and global stakeholders is required for improving the immunisation status of Pakistani children, global health security and the sustainable development goals.

Indexed as

Child HealthProgram EvaluationVaccinationChildChild MortalityCommunity ParticipationDecision MakingDelivery of Health CareDeveloping CountriesGlobal HealthGovernment ProgramsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PolicyHumansImmunizationImmunization ProgramsVaccineschallengesgovernancehealth systemImmunisation programmePakistan

Identifiers

PMID31101060
PMCPMC6525435
OpenAlexW2946051237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.