Trial reportBMC nephrology2019
Interventional study to improve adherence to phosphate binder treatment in dialysis patients.
Trial report in BMC nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of tenapanor in managing hyperphosphatemia and constipation in hemodialysis patients: A randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Effect of a transtheoretical model-based intervention and motivational interviewing on hyperphosphatemia management via telehealth (TMT program) among hemodialysis patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in public health · 2024Trial
- The role of clinical pharmacist in enhancing hemodialysis patients' adherence and clinical outcomes: a randomized-controlled study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2022Trial
- Implementation fidelity of a pharmacist-led intervention program to improve a high serum phosphate concentration in haemodialysis patients: a mixed-methods study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- An Integrated, Evidence-Guided Framework for Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management: Behavioral Mechanisms, Implementation Strategies, and Real-World Application.Kidney & blood pressure research · 2026Review
- Cholestyramine in hemodialysis: a new approach for hyperphosphatemia management.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2025Article
- Phosphorus Knowledge and Dietary Intake of Phosphorus of US Adults Undergoing Dialysis.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Structural Equation Modelling to Identify Psychometric Determinants of Medication Adherence in a Survey of Kidney Dialysis Patients.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Article
- Breast Cancer and Bone Mineral Density in a U.S. Cohort of Middle-Aged Women: Associations with Phosphate Toxicity.Cancers · 2023Article
- The Impact of Medical Nutrition Intervention on the Management of Hyperphosphatemia in Hemodialysis Patients with Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease: A Case Series.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- What Factors Make EU Regulators Want to Communicate Drug Safety Issues Related to SGLT2 Inhibitors? An Online Survey Study.Drug safety · 2023Article
- Phosphate Frustration: Treatment Options to Complement Current Therapies.International journal of nephrology · 2022Review
- Impact of community pharmacist-led intensive education on the control of serum phosphate levels in haemodialysis patients.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Article
- 10-Year Evaluation of Adherence and Satisfaction with Information about Tolvaptan in ADPKD: A Single-Center Pilot Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Phosphate binders usage, patients knowledge, and adherence. A cross-sectional study in 4 centers at Qassim, Saudi Arabia.Saudi medical journal · 2020Article
- Phosphate binders in chronic kidney disease: an updated narrative review of recent data.Journal of nephrology · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdherence to phosphate binder treatment is important to prevent high serum phosphate level in chronic dialysis patients. We therefore wanted to investigate patient knowledge, beliefs about and adherence to phosphate binders among these patients and assess whether one-to-one pharmacist-led education and counselling enhance adherence and lead to changes in serum phosphate levels.
methodsA descriptive, interventional, single arm, pre-post study was performed at a hospital in Norway, including chronic dialysis patients aged 18 years or more using phosphate binders. The primary end-point was change in the proportion of patients with serum phosphate below 1.80 mmol/L and the secondary end-points included change in the patient's knowledge, beliefs and adherence after the intervention measured by completion of questionnaires 'Patient Knowledge', Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS- 5) and Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). Data was collected both prior to and after one-to-one pharmacist-led education and counselling about their phosphate binders. Other medicines used by the patient was also registered.
resultsA total of 69 patients were enrolled in the study. After intervention, the probability of serum phosphate being below the target threshold 1.80 mmol/L (5.58 mg/dL) increased, although no significant change in mean serum phosphate levels was seen. On the other hand, the knowledge regarding phosphate binder treatment and the patients' beliefs about the necessity of the treatment increased, while the concerns decreased (BMQ). This effect did not lead to increase in self-reported adherence measured by MARS-5. However the scores were high before the intervention.
conclusionsShort term one-to-one individualized pharmacist-led education and counselling about phosphate binders increased the probability of serum phosphate concentrations being below the target threshold level 1.80 mmol/L (5.58 mg/dL), although not statistically significant. However, it did not decrease the mean serum phosphate level or increase the patients' self-reported adherence. The patients increased their knowledge about the phosphate binder and their understanding of adherence, and were less concerned about the side effects of the medication.
trial registrationISRCTN52852596 , registered 11 April 2019. The trial was registered retrospectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.