Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31101020›Full record

Trial reportBMC nephrology2019

Interventional study to improve adherence to phosphate binder treatment in dialysis patients.

Bodil Jahren Hjemås, Katrine Bøvre, Liv Mathiesen, Jonas Christoffer Lindstrøm, Kathrin Bjerknes

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cholestyramine in hemodialysis: a new approach for hyperphosphatemia management.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bodil Jahren HjemåsHospital Pharmacies Enterprise, South Eastern Norway, Stenersgate 1, PB. 79, 0050, Oslo, Norway. bodil.jahren.hjemas@sykehusapotekene.no.ORCID 0000-0002-6956-2859
Katrine BøvreHospital Pharmacies Enterprise, South Eastern Norway, Stenersgate 1, PB. 79, 0050, Oslo, Norway.
Liv MathiesenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Jonas Christoffer LindstrømHealth Services Research Units, Akershus University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kathrin BjerknesHospital Pharmacies Enterprise, South Eastern Norway, Stenersgate 1, PB. 79, 0050, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOSmerteklinikken · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdherence to phosphate binder treatment is important to prevent high serum phosphate level in chronic dialysis patients. We therefore wanted to investigate patient knowledge, beliefs about and adherence to phosphate binders among these patients and assess whether one-to-one pharmacist-led education and counselling enhance adherence and lead to changes in serum phosphate levels.

methodsA descriptive, interventional, single arm, pre-post study was performed at a hospital in Norway, including chronic dialysis patients aged 18 years or more using phosphate binders. The primary end-point was change in the proportion of patients with serum phosphate below 1.80 mmol/L and the secondary end-points included change in the patient's knowledge, beliefs and adherence after the intervention measured by completion of questionnaires 'Patient Knowledge', Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS- 5) and Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). Data was collected both prior to and after one-to-one pharmacist-led education and counselling about their phosphate binders. Other medicines used by the patient was also registered.

resultsA total of 69 patients were enrolled in the study. After intervention, the probability of serum phosphate being below the target threshold 1.80 mmol/L (5.58 mg/dL) increased, although no significant change in mean serum phosphate levels was seen. On the other hand, the knowledge regarding phosphate binder treatment and the patients' beliefs about the necessity of the treatment increased, while the concerns decreased (BMQ). This effect did not lead to increase in self-reported adherence measured by MARS-5. However the scores were high before the intervention.

conclusionsShort term one-to-one individualized pharmacist-led education and counselling about phosphate binders increased the probability of serum phosphate concentrations being below the target threshold level 1.80 mmol/L (5.58 mg/dL), although not statistically significant. However, it did not decrease the mean serum phosphate level or increase the patients' self-reported adherence. The patients increased their knowledge about the phosphate binder and their understanding of adherence, and were less concerned about the side effects of the medication.

trial registrationISRCTN52852596 , registered 11 April 2019. The trial was registered retrospectively.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCounselingFemaleHumansHyperphosphatemiaMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPatient Education as TopicPharmacistsPhosphatesRenal DialysisTreatment OutcomePhosphatesAdherenceBeliefs about medicinesHemodialysisHyperphosphatemiaPharmacist led educationPhosphate binder

Identifiers

PMID31101020
PMCPMC6525353
OpenAlexW2947519411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.