Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31100847›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019

Timing of Ureteric Stent Removal and Occurrence of Urological Complications after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Isis J Visser, Jasper P T van der Staaij, Anand Muthusamy, Michelle Willicombe, Jeffrey A Lafranca, Frank J M F Dor

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. [Effect and safety of self-draining ureteral stent with thread in kidney transplant reci-pients].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isis J VisserImperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0HS, UK. isisjasmijn@hotmail.com.
Jasper P T van der StaaijImperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0HS, UK. jaspervanderstaay@hotmail.com.
Anand MuthusamyImperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0HS, UK. anand.muthusamy@nhs.net.
Michelle WillicombeImperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0HS, UK. michelle.willicombe@nhs.net.
Jeffrey A LafrancaImperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0HS, UK. j.a.lafranca@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2727-0524
Frank J M F DorImperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0HS, UK. frank.dor@nhs.net.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implanting a ureteric stent during ureteroneocystostomy reduces the risk of leakage and ureteral stenosis after kidney transplantation (KTx), but it may also predispose to urinary tract infections (UTIs). The aim of this study is to determine the optimal timing for ureteric stent removal after KTx. Searches were performed in EMBASE, MEDLINE Ovid, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (until November 2017). For this systematic review, all aspects of the Cochrane Handbook for Interventional Systematic Reviews were followed and it was written based on the PRISMA-statement. Articles discussing JJ-stents (double-J stents) and their time of removal in relation to outcomes, UTIs, urinary leakage, ureteral stenosis or reintervention were included. One-thousand-and-forty-three articles were identified, of which fourteen articles (three randomised controlled trials, nine retrospective cohort studies, and two prospective cohort studies) were included (describing in total

Indexed as

kidney transplantationtiming of removalureteric stenturinary tract infectionurological complications

Identifiers

PMID31100847
PMCPMC6572676
OpenAlexW2946618501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.