Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31100217›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2019

Use of Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab for Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Influence of CATT Results and Introduction of Aflibercept.

Suzann Pershing, Nidhi Talwar, Stephen T Armenti, Joseph Grubbs, Julie M Rosenthal, Vaidehi S Dedania, Joshua D Stein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Drug Delivery Technologies for the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suzann PershingByers Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Nidhi TalwarDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Center for Eye Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Stephen T ArmentiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Joseph GrubbsDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Julie M RosenthalDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Vaidehi S DedaniaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Joshua D SteinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Center for Eye Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Electronic address: jdstein@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

Personalized Forecasting of Disease Trajectory for Patients with Open Angle GlaucomaR01EY026641 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LAVIERI-WILLIAMS, MARIEL SOFIA, STEIN, JOSHUA D · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
Impact and outcomes of cataract surgery among patients with Alzheimer's DiseaseR03AG056453 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PERSHING, SUZANN · 2017 to 2018
$236k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026641NIA NIH HHS R03 AG056453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess whether publication of Comparison of Age-related macular degeneration Treatment Trial (CATT) results and introduction of aflibercept to the marketplace affected intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab utilization.

designRetrospective analysis of treatment patterns.

methodsWe calculated weekly bevacizumab and ranibizumab utilization during 3 timeframes: (1) before CATT publication, (2) between CATT publication (April 28, 2011) and assignment of a unique aflibercept billing code (January 1, 2013), and (3) afterward for 164,188 Medicare beneficiaries with neovascular macular degeneration receiving ≥1 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection(s) from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2014. We identified ophthalmologists who predominantly (≥80%) administered bevacizumab or ranibizumab and evaluated changes in preferences over the 3 periods. We replicated analyses on 881,381 commercially insured beneficiaries.

resultsAmong 317 ophthalmologists administering predominantly ranibizumab to Medicare beneficiaries pre-CATT, 221 (69.7%) reduced ranibizumab use post-CATT, whereas 96 (30.3%) continued using ranibizumab ≥80% of the time. Findings were reversed among 1041 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered bevacizumab pre-CATT-777 (74.6%) continued bevacizumab-predominant use while 264 (25.4%) reduced bevacizumab use post-CATT. Among the 145 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered ranibizumab before aflibercept's availability, 77 (53.1%) reduced ranibizumab utilization and 68 (46.9%) continued using ranibizumab ≥80% of the time after aflibercept became available. Corresponding numbers among the 909 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered bevacizumab pre-aflibercept were 381 (41.9%) reducing and 528 (58.1%) continuing bevacizumab-predominant use. Similar results were observed for commercially insured patients.

conclusionsMany ophthalmologists who favored ranibizumab switched to bevacizumab after CATT publication, while most who favored bevacizumab before CATT publication continued favoring it afterward. Aflibercept's introduction had little impact on preferences for ranibizumab or bevacizumab.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRetrospective StudiesWet Macular DegenerationafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31100217
PMCPMC6856411
OpenAlexW2946468044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.