ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2019
Use of Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab for Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Influence of CATT Results and Introduction of Aflibercept.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- U.S. trends of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor use from 2017-2023: An analysis of medicare, medicaid, and commercial insurance.PloS one · 2026Article
- Drug Delivery Technologies for the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Review
- Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of Ocular Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The potential effects of newer groups of glucose lowering drugs on age-related macular degeneration.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Medicare Part B Spending on Macular Degeneration Treatments Associated With Manufacturer Payments to Ophthalmologists.JAMA health forum · 2023Article
- Evaluation of macular vascular density and foveal avascular zone changes by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) after intravitreal dexamethasone implant in diabetic macular edema resistant to Anti-VEGF treatment.International ophthalmology · 2022Article
- IQGAP1 causes choroidal neovascularization by sustaining VEGFR2-mediated Rac1 activation.Angiogenesis · 2020Article
- Effect of different lens status on intraocular pressure elevation in patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections.International journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Pharmacokinetics of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Drugs in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Pharmaceutics · 2019Review
- A Solid Dispersion of Quercetin Shows Enhanced Nrf2 Activation and Protective Effects against Oxidative Injury in a Mouse Model of Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess whether publication of Comparison of Age-related macular degeneration Treatment Trial (CATT) results and introduction of aflibercept to the marketplace affected intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab utilization.
designRetrospective analysis of treatment patterns.
methodsWe calculated weekly bevacizumab and ranibizumab utilization during 3 timeframes: (1) before CATT publication, (2) between CATT publication (April 28, 2011) and assignment of a unique aflibercept billing code (January 1, 2013), and (3) afterward for 164,188 Medicare beneficiaries with neovascular macular degeneration receiving ≥1 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection(s) from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2014. We identified ophthalmologists who predominantly (≥80%) administered bevacizumab or ranibizumab and evaluated changes in preferences over the 3 periods. We replicated analyses on 881,381 commercially insured beneficiaries.
resultsAmong 317 ophthalmologists administering predominantly ranibizumab to Medicare beneficiaries pre-CATT, 221 (69.7%) reduced ranibizumab use post-CATT, whereas 96 (30.3%) continued using ranibizumab ≥80% of the time. Findings were reversed among 1041 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered bevacizumab pre-CATT-777 (74.6%) continued bevacizumab-predominant use while 264 (25.4%) reduced bevacizumab use post-CATT. Among the 145 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered ranibizumab before aflibercept's availability, 77 (53.1%) reduced ranibizumab utilization and 68 (46.9%) continued using ranibizumab ≥80% of the time after aflibercept became available. Corresponding numbers among the 909 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered bevacizumab pre-aflibercept were 381 (41.9%) reducing and 528 (58.1%) continuing bevacizumab-predominant use. Similar results were observed for commercially insured patients.
conclusionsMany ophthalmologists who favored ranibizumab switched to bevacizumab after CATT publication, while most who favored bevacizumab before CATT publication continued favoring it afterward. Aflibercept's introduction had little impact on preferences for ranibizumab or bevacizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.