Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31100135›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2019

Communicating About Stopping Cancer Screening: Comparing Clinicians' and Older Adults' Perspectives.

Nancy L Schoenborn, Cynthia M Boyd, Sei J Lee, Danelle Cayea, Craig E Pollack

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A Closer Look-Who Are We Screening for Lung Cancer?Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2023
    Article
  10. Women's experiences of age-related discontinuation from mammography screening: A qualitative interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy L SchoenbornDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Cynthia M BoydDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sei J LeeDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Danelle CayeaDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Craig E PollackDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchKL2TR001077 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$9.2M
Patient-Centered Care for Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions: Research and Mentoring ProgramK24AG056578 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, CYNTHIA MELINDA · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
Improving cancer screening in older adults with limited life expectancyK76AG059984 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHOENBORN, NANCY · 2018 to 2021
$972k
A Network Analytic Approach to Modeling Variation in Prostate Cancer CareK07CA151910 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI POLLACK, CRAIG EVAN · 2011 to 2015
$780k
Treatment Burden in Older Adults with Diabetes and MultimorbidityK23AG032910 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, CYNTHIA MELINDA · 2009 to 2013
$533k
Understanding Older Adults' Perspectives on How to Incorporate Life Expectancy in Cancer ScreeningR03AG050912 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHOENBORN, NANCY · 2015 to 2016
$243k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001077NCI NIH HHS K07 CA151910NIA NIH HHS K23 AG032910NIA NIH HHS K24 AG056578NIA NIH HHS K76 AG059984NIA NIH HHS R03 AG050912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesOlder adults with limited life expectancy frequently receive cancer screening. We sought to compare the perspectives of clinicians and older adults on how to communicate about stopping cancer screening. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe used data from two studies involving semistructured in-person individual interviews, in which we asked about perspectives on communication about stopping cancer screening, with 28 primary care clinicians and 40 community-dwelling older adults, respectively.

resultsWe identified three major themes: (a) Consensus among primary care clinicians and older adults regarding communication around stopping cancer screening. Both groups considered discussing the benefits/risks of cancer screening and involving patients in the decision as important and mentioned framing screening cessation as shift in health priorities. (b) Differences in perceived reactions to stopping cancer screening. Primary care clinicians were concerned about patient reaction to stopping cancer screening, whereas older adults reported no negative reactions in the context of a trusting relationship. (c) Differences in views around whether to discuss life expectancy in the context of stopping cancer screening. Clinicians rarely discussed life expectancy in this context, whereas older adults were divided on whether life expectancy should be discussed. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Given the heterogeneity in older adults' preferences, it is important to assess whether patients want to discuss life expectancy when discussing stopping cancer screening, though use of the specific term "life expectancy" may not be necessary. Instead, focusing discussion on the benefits/risks of cancer screening and mentioning shift in health priorities are acceptable communication strategies for both clinicians and older adults.

Indexed as

CommunicationEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsQualitative ResearchLongevityPhysician-patient communicationPreventive medicineQualitative research methods

Identifiers

PMID31100135
PMCPMC6524758
OpenAlexW2945079346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.