Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31099396›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2019

Validation of the GARD™skin Assay for Assessment of Chemical Skin Sensitizers: Ring Trial Results of Predictive Performance and Reproducibility.

Henrik Johansson, Robin Gradin, Angelica Johansson, Els Adriaens, Amber Edwards, Veronika Zuckerstätter, Anders Jerre, Florence Burleson, Helge Gehrke, Erwin L Roggen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The OASIS Consortium: integrating multi-omics technologies to transform chemical safety assessment.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Henrik JohanssonSenzaGen AB, 22381 Lund, Sweden.
Robin GradinSenzaGen AB, 22381 Lund, Sweden.
Angelica JohanssonSenzaGen AB, 22381 Lund, Sweden.
Els AdriaensAdriaens Consulting BVBA, Aalter 9881, Belgium.
Amber EdwardsBurleson Research Technologies, Morrisville, North Carolina 27560.
Veronika ZuckerstätterEurofins BioPharma Product Testing Munich GmbH, 82152 Planegg, Germany.
Anders JerreSenzaGen AB, 22381 Lund, Sweden.
Florence BurlesonBurleson Research Technologies, Morrisville, North Carolina 27560.
Helge GehrkeEurofins BioPharma Product Testing Munich GmbH, 82152 Planegg, Germany.
Erwin L Roggen3RsMC Aps, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proactive identification of chemicals with skin sensitizing properties is a key toxicological endpoint within chemical safety assessment, as required by legislation for registration of chemicals. In order to meet demands of increased animal welfare and facilitate increased testing efficiency also in nonregulatory settings, considerable efforts have been made to develop nonanimal approaches to replace current animal testing. Genomic Allergen Rapid Detection (GARD™) is a state-of-the-art technology platform, the most advanced application of which is the assay for assessment of skin sensitizing chemicals, GARD™skin. The methodology is based on a dendritic cell (DC)-like cell line, thus mimicking the mechanistic events leading to initiation and modulation of downstream immunological responses. Induced transcriptional changes are measured following exposure to test chemicals, providing a detailed evaluation of cell activation. These changes are associated with the immunological decision-making role of DCs in vivo and include among other phenotypic modifications, up-regulation of co-stimulatory molecules, induction of cellular and oxidative stress pathways and xenobiotic responses, and provide a holistic readout of substance-induced DC activation. Here, results from an inter-laboratory ring trial of GARD™skin, conducted in compliance with OECD guidance documents and comprising a blinded chemical test set of 28 chemicals, are summarized. The assay was found to be transferable to naïve laboratories, with an inter-laboratory reproducibility of 92.0%. The within-laboratory reproducibility ranged between 82.1% and 88.9%, whereas the cumulative predictive accuracy across the 3 laboratories was 93.8%. It was concluded that GARD™skin is a robust and reliable method for the identification of skin sensitizing chemicals and suitable for stand-alone use or as a constituent of integrated testing. These data form the basis for the regulatory validation of GARD™skin.

Indexed as

AllergensAnimal Testing AlternativesDendritic CellsDermatitis, Allergic ContactGenomicsHumansImmunizationIn Vitro TechniquesReproducibility of ResultsSkinAllergenschemical sensitizersGARD™GARD™skinin vitrosensitization

Identifiers

PMID31099396
PMCPMC6657565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.