ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2019
Validation of the GARD™skin Assay for Assessment of Chemical Skin Sensitizers: Ring Trial Results of Predictive Performance and Reproducibility.
Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- A proposed evaluation of new approach methodologies for dermal toxicity assessment of botanicals.Pharmaceutical biology · 2026Review
- Current and emerging new approach & methodologies for skin hazard assessment.Toxicological research · 2026Review
- Article
- The OASIS Consortium: integrating multi-omics technologies to transform chemical safety assessment.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025Article
- The Carba Mix-In Vitro Investigations of Potential Cocktail Effects in Patch Tests With Rubber Allergens.Contact dermatitis · 2025Article
- The important role of standards for the uptake of transcriptomics and metabolomics based in vitro methods in regulatory toxicology.Archives of toxicology · 2025Review
- Requirements for Alternative In Vitro and In Silico Skin Models of Irritant and Allergic Contact Dermatitis.Contact dermatitis · 2025Review
- Wisdom of Crowds for Supporting the Safety Evaluation of Nanomaterials.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Progress in toxicogenomics to protect human health.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
- 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole: MAK Value Documentation, addendum - Translation of the German version from 2022.The MAK collection for occupational health and safety · 2025Review
- In vitro characterisation of a novel rubber contact allergen in protective gloves.Contact dermatitis · 2025Article
- Avoiding a reproducibility crisis in regulatory toxicology-on the fundamental role of ring trials.Archives of toxicology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the applicability of GARDskin to predict skin sensitizers in extracts from medical device materials.Frontiers in toxicology · 2024Article
- Review
- Replacement of animal testing by integrated approaches to testing and assessment (IATA): a call for in vivitrosi.Archives of toxicology · 2022Review
- Adjuvants in fungicide formulations can be skin sensitizers and cause different types of cell stress responses.Toxicology reports · 2022Article
- Quantitative assessment of sensitizing potency using a dose-response adaptation of GARDskin.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Interpretation of murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) data for skin sensitization: Overload effects, danger signals and chemistry-based read-across.Current research in toxicology · 2021Article
- Review
- A Multi-Organ-on-Chip Approach to Investigate How Oral Exposure to Metals Can Cause Systemic Toxicity Leading to Langerhans Cell Activation in Skin.Frontiers in toxicology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proactive identification of chemicals with skin sensitizing properties is a key toxicological endpoint within chemical safety assessment, as required by legislation for registration of chemicals. In order to meet demands of increased animal welfare and facilitate increased testing efficiency also in nonregulatory settings, considerable efforts have been made to develop nonanimal approaches to replace current animal testing. Genomic Allergen Rapid Detection (GARD™) is a state-of-the-art technology platform, the most advanced application of which is the assay for assessment of skin sensitizing chemicals, GARD™skin. The methodology is based on a dendritic cell (DC)-like cell line, thus mimicking the mechanistic events leading to initiation and modulation of downstream immunological responses. Induced transcriptional changes are measured following exposure to test chemicals, providing a detailed evaluation of cell activation. These changes are associated with the immunological decision-making role of DCs in vivo and include among other phenotypic modifications, up-regulation of co-stimulatory molecules, induction of cellular and oxidative stress pathways and xenobiotic responses, and provide a holistic readout of substance-induced DC activation. Here, results from an inter-laboratory ring trial of GARD™skin, conducted in compliance with OECD guidance documents and comprising a blinded chemical test set of 28 chemicals, are summarized. The assay was found to be transferable to naïve laboratories, with an inter-laboratory reproducibility of 92.0%. The within-laboratory reproducibility ranged between 82.1% and 88.9%, whereas the cumulative predictive accuracy across the 3 laboratories was 93.8%. It was concluded that GARD™skin is a robust and reliable method for the identification of skin sensitizing chemicals and suitable for stand-alone use or as a constituent of integrated testing. These data form the basis for the regulatory validation of GARD™skin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.