Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31099338›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Assessment of Use and Preferences Regarding Internet-Based Health Care Delivery: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Georgios Paslakis, Josefine Fischer-Jacobs, Lars Pape, Mario Schiffer, Raoul Gertges, Uwe Tegtbur, Tanja Zimmermann, Mariel Nöhre, Martina de Zwaan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Georgios PaslakisUniversity Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2069-0024
Josefine Fischer-JacobsDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3396-5020
Lars PapeDepartment of Pediatric, Liver and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3635-6418
Mario SchifferDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8414-1470
Raoul GertgesProject Kidney Transplantation 360°, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5127-7267
Uwe TegtburProject Kidney Transplantation 360°, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4071-3385
Tanja ZimmermannDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5069-7278
Mariel NöhreDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0700-4509
Martina de ZwaanDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7918-6957

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been an incremental increase in the use of technology in health care delivery. Feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of interventions based on internet technologies are supported by a growing body of evidence.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate use and preferences in the general adult population in Germany for remote, internet-based interaction (eg, email, videoconferencing, electronic medical records, apps).

methodsA nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey in adults that was representative in terms of age, sex and educational level was carried out.

resultsA total of 22.16% (538/2428) of survey participants reported not using the internet for work or private use. The nonuser phenotype can be described as being older, having lower educational and income status, and living in less populated areas. The majority of participants within the cohort of internet users reported that they would not consider using electronic medical records (973/1849, 52.62%), apps (988/1854, 53.29%), or emails to report symptoms (1040/1838, 56.58%); teleconference with one (1185/1852, 63.98%) or more experts (1239/1853, 66.86%); or participate in video psychotherapy (1476/1853, 79.65%) for the purpose of medical consultation or treatment. Older age and lower educational level were the most robust predictors of assumed future denial of use.

conclusionsOur results point toward low use and preference rates among the general population for the use of telemedicine. It also seems that those who might benefit from telemedical interventions the most, are, in fact, those who are most hesitating. These low use and preference rates of eHealth should be considered prior to designing and providing future telemedical care, supporting the need for easy-to-use, data secure solutions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineYoung AdulteHealthelectronic medical recordshealth care deliveryinternetonline psychotherapyteleconferencetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID31099338
PMCPMC6542248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.