Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31099170›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the International AIDS Society2019

Prevalence and factors associated with fertility desires/intentions among individuals in HIV-serodiscordant relationships: a systematic review of empirical studies.

Alexandra Martins, Stephanie Alves, Catarina Chaves, Maria C Canavarro, Marco Pereira

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandra MartinsFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4682-5126
Stephanie AlvesFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7326-7115
Catarina ChavesFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3963-1187
Maria C CanavarroFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5083-7322
Marco PereiraFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6086-2329

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBetter knowledge about fertility desires/intentions among HIV-serodiscordant partners who face unique challenges when considering childbearing may be helpful in the development of targeted reproductive interventions. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the published literature regarding the prevalence of fertility desires/intentions and its associated factors among individuals in HIV-serodiscordant relationships while distinguishing low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) from high-income countries (HIC).

methodsA systematic search of all papers published prior to February 2017 was conducted in four electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Cochrane Library). Empirical studies published in peer-reviewed journals with individuals in HIV-serodiscordant relationships assessing the prevalence of fertility desires/intentions and/or the associated factors were included in this systematic review. This review adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: After screening 1852 references, 29 studies were included, of which 21 were conducted in LMIC and eight in HIC. A great variability in the prevalence of fertility desires/intentions was observed in LMIC (8% to 84% (one member of the dyad included)). In HIC, the results showed a smaller discrepancy between in the prevalence (32% to 58% (one member of the dyad included)); the prevalence was higher when the couple was the unit of analysis (64% to 73%), which may be related to the fact that all these studies were conducted in the context of assisted reproduction. Few studies examined the factors associated with fertility desires/intentions, and all except one were conducted in LMIC. Individuals (e.g. number of children), couple-level (e.g. belief that the partner wanted children) and structural factors (e.g. discussions with health workers) were found to be associated.

conclusionsThe results of this systematic review suggest that many individuals in HIV-serodiscordant relationships have fertility desires/intentions, although the prevalence is particularly heterogeneous in LMIC in comparison to HIC. Well-known factors such as younger age and a fewer number of living children were consistently associated with increased fertility desires/intentions. Different couple-level factors emerged, reflecting the importance of considering both the individual and the couple. However, further studies that specifically focus on the dyad as the unit of analysis are warranted.

Indexed as

FertilityAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIncomeIntentionMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSexual Partnersfactorsfertility desires/intentionsHIV/AIDSprevalenceserodiscordancysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31099170
PMCPMC6523008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.