Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31099145›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2019

Transitional care practices, services, and delivery in childhood cancer survivor programs: A survey study of U.S. survivorship providers.

Karim Thomas Sadak, Dava Szalda, Bruce R Lindgren, Karen E Kinahan, Debra Eshelman-Kent, Lisa A Schwartz, Tara Henderson, David R Freyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The current state of adult metabolic medicine in the United States: Results of a nationwide survey.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karim Thomas SadakUniversity of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital, University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-4511-5456
Dava SzaldaThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Bruce R LindgrenBiostatistics and Informatics Core, University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Karen E KinahanRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Debra Eshelman-KentThe Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Lisa A SchwartzThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Tara HendersonComer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
David R FreyerChildren's Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Department of Pediatrics and Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-990X

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Fumito Ito · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are limited reports describing transition of young adult childhood cancer survivors (CCS) from pediatric to adult-focused survivorship care. The purpose of this study was to characterize current transitional care practices in the United States. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An online survey was sent to one preselected respondent at 163 Children's Oncology Group member institutions in the United States. Data were collected about (i) the availability and type of long-term follow-up services for adult CCS and (ii) policies and procedures for transitioning. Logistic regression was used to evaluate factors related to care for CCS.

resultsThe response rate was 60% (97/163). Eighty-one respondents (84%) represented centers with specialized pediatric-focused CCS programs. Thirty-nine percent (38/97) of programs delivered specialized transitional care for adult CCS. Adult-centered care was delivered in both pediatric (39%, 15/38) and adult oncology clinics (39%, 15/38). The most common perceived transition barriers were lack of available partnering adult providers and adult providers' lack of knowledge regarding CCS. The larger the program in terms of new diagnoses, the more likely they were to offer formal transitional care (<50 vs >200: odds ratios [OR] 20.0; 95% CI 3.2, 100.0, P = 0.004).

conclusionsA variety of models are utilized for delivering care to adult CCS. Our results suggest that interventions to establish effective partnerships with adult providers on appropriate care of CCS may facilitate expanded availability of these services.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultCancer SurvivorsChildDelivery of Health CareFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNeoplasmsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Professional PracticePrognosisSurvival RateSurvivorshiptransition childhood cancer survivor survey

Identifiers

PMID31099145
PMCPMC7521144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.