Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31098974›Full record

Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2019

Practical Use of Process Mapping to Guide Implementation of a Care Coordination Program for Rural Veterans.

Marina S McCreight, Heather M Gilmartin, Chelsea A Leonard, Ashlea L Mayberry, Lynette R Kelley, Brandi K Lippmann, Andrew S Coy, Tiffany A Radcliff, Murray J Côté, Robert E Burke

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Process mapping in healthcare: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marina S McCreightSeattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, CO, USA. Marina.McCreight@va.gov.
Heather M GilmartinSeattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, CO, USA.
Chelsea A LeonardSeattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, CO, USA.
Ashlea L MayberrySeattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, CO, USA.
Lynette R KelleySeattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, CO, USA.
Brandi K LippmannSeattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, CO, USA.
Andrew S CoySeattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, CO, USA.
Tiffany A RadcliffDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Murray J CôtéDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Robert E BurkeCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Center for Innovation · USTexas A&M University · USVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System · USPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · US

Funding

HSRD VA IK2 HX001796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransitions of care are high risk for vulnerable populations such as rural Veterans, and adequate care coordination can alleviate many risks. Single-center care coordination programs have shown promise in improving transitional care practices. However, best practices for implementing effective transitional care interventions are unknown, and a common pitfall is lack of understanding of the current process at different sites. The rural Transitions Nurse Program (TNP) is a Veterans Health Administration (VA) intervention that addresses the unique transitional care coordination needs of rural Veterans, and it is currently being implemented in five VA facilities.

objectiveWe sought to employ and study process mapping as a tool for assessing site context prior to implementation of TNP, a new care coordination program. DESIGN AND

participantsObservational qualitative study guided by the Lean Six Sigma approach. Data were collected in January-March 2017 through interviews, direct observations, and group sessions with front-line staff, including VA providers, nurses, and administrative staff from five VA Medical Centers and nine rural Patient-Aligned Care Teams. KEY

resultsWe integrated key informant interviews, observational data, and group sessions to create ten process maps depicting the care coordination process prior to TNP implementation at each expansion site. These maps were used to adapt implementation through informing the unique role of the Transitions Nurse at each site and will be used in evaluating the program, which is essential to understanding the program's impact.

conclusionsProcess mapping can be a valuable and practical approach to accurately assess site processes before implementation of care coordination programs in complex systems. The process mapping activities were useful in engaging the local staff and simultaneously guided adaptations to the TNP intervention to meet local needs. Our approach-combining multiple data sources while adapting Lean Six Sigma principles into practical use-may be generalizable to other care coordination programs.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationVeteransContinuity of Patient CareHealth Plan ImplementationHumansQualitative ResearchUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairscare coordinationprocess mappingVeterans

Identifiers

PMID31098974
PMCPMC6542877
OpenAlexW2945718698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.