ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019
Bioaerosols in the waterpipe cafés: genera, levels, and factors influencing their concentrations.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indoor air pollution due to bacterial bioaerosols in beauty salons of Ardabil, Iran: characterization, influencing factors and health risk assessment.Journal of environmental health science & engineering · 2025Article
- Bacteria bioaerosol in the indoor air of educational microenvironments: Measuring exposures and assessing health effects.Journal of environmental health science & engineering · 2021Article
- Latent class analysis of initial nicotine dependence among adult waterpipe smokers.Journal of environmental health science & engineering · 2021Article
- COVID-19 and beliefs about tobacco use: an online cross-sectional study in Iran.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- The effects of ventilation and building characteristics on indoor air quality in waterpipe cafés.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study was conducted in order to assess the exposure to bacterial and fungal bioaerosols in the air of waterpipe cafés (AWPCs), in the hose of waterpipe (HWP), and in the water bowl of the waterpipe (WBWP) and to investigate the factors influence increasing the contamination levels in waterpipe cafés in Ardabil. From all the 50 cafés studied, the samples were taken from air and from water contained in water bowl and hose for bacterial and fungal analyses. The results demonstrated that the mean numbers of bacteria and fungi in the indoor air of café, hose, and water bowl were 33.90 ± 14.86 and 25.24 ± 1.99 CFU/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
31098913What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.