Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31098884›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2019

Patient experiences with outpatient care in Hungary: results of an online population survey.

Óscar Brito Fernandes, Petra Baji, Dionne Kringos, Niek Klazinga, László Gulácsi, Armin Lucevic, Imre Boncz, Márta Péntek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Population norms for the EQ-5D-5L for Hungary: comparison of online surveys and computer assisted personal interviews.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. What Factors Influence Patient Measures of Safety Among Adults?Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Óscar Brito FernandesDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8., Budapest, 1093, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3212-373X
Petra BajiDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8., Budapest, 1093, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2899-8557
Dionne KringosDepartment of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2711-4713
Niek KlazingaDepartment of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3937-8014
László GulácsiDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8., Budapest, 1093, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9285-8746
Armin LucevicDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8., Budapest, 1093, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9361-1633
Imre BonczInstitute for Health Insurance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Mária u. 5-7, Pécs, 7621, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3699-6236
Márta PéntekDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8., Budapest, 1093, Hungary. marta.pentek@uni-corvinus.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9636-6012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth systems are undertaking efforts to make health care more patient centered and value based. To achieve this goal, the use of patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) is increasing, especially across OECD countries. However, in Hungary, data on patients' experiences are still lacking. Thus, our aim was twofold: first, to collect data on outpatient experience in Hungary on patient-doctor communication and patient involvement in decision making and compare it with that of other OECD countries; second, to assess associations of outpatient experience with patients' socioeconomic characteristics.

methodsIn early 2019, we conducted a cross-sectional, online, self-administered survey in a national representative sample of Hungary's population (n = 1000). The sample was weighted considering gender, age, highest education level attained, type of settlement, and region of residence. The survey questions were based on a set of recommended questions by the OECD.

resultsOur findings show that the proportion of reported positive experiences is as follows: doctors providing easy-to-understand explanations (93.1%) followed by time spent on the consultation (87.5%), opportunities to raise questions (85.8%), and doctors involving patients in decision making about care and treatment (80.1%). The share of positive experiences falls behind OECD's average regarding patient-doctor communication and patient involvement in decision making, which signals room for improvement in these areas.

conclusionsWomen, younger people, people with a paid job, and patients with consultations with allied health professionals reported significant lesser positive care experiences and, hence, more targeted policies can be initiated based on our findings.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresPhysician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAmbulatory CareCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesDecision Making, SharedDeveloped CountriesFemaleHumansHungaryInternetMaleHungaryOECDOutpatient carePatient-reported experience measureQuality of careSurvey

Identifiers

PMID31098884
PMCPMC6544599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.