Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31098846›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2019

A Proof of Concept for 3D Printing of Solid Lipid-Based Formulations of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs to Control Formulation Dispersion Kinetics.

Kapilkumar Vithani, Alvaro Goyanes, Vincent Jannin, Abdul W Basit, Simon Gaisford, Ben J Boyd

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structured engineering of self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS)International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kapilkumar VithaniDrug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University (Parkville Campus), Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
Alvaro GoyanesUCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.
Vincent JanninGattefossé SAS, 36 Chemin de Genas, 69804, Saint-Priest, France.
Abdul W BasitUCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.
Simon GaisfordUCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.
Ben J BoydDrug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University (Parkville Campus), Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia. ben.boyd@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5434-590X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe use of three-dimensional printing (3DP) in the development of pharmaceutical dosage forms is growing rapidly. However, the research is almost exclusively focussed on polymer-based systems with very little reported on 3D printing of lipid-based formulations. Thus, the aim of the work was to explore the feasibility of 3DP technology to prepare solid lipid-based formulations. Here, 3DP was applied for the preparation of solid self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems (S-SMEDDS) with defined surface area to volume (SA/V) ratios.

methodsThe S-SMEDDS formulations, comprised of Gelucire® 44/14, Gelucire® 48/16 and Kolliphor® P 188 were loaded with fenofibrate or cinnarizine as model drugs. The formulations were printed into four geometrical shapes - cylindrical, prism, cube and torus, and compared to a control cube manually prepared from bulk formulation.

resultsThe printing process was not significantly affected by the presence of the model drugs. The as-printed S-SMEDDS formulations were characterised using differential scanning calorimetry and wide-angle X-ray scattering. The kinetics of dispersion depended on the SA/V ratio values. The digestion process was affected by the initial geometry of the dosage form by virtue of the kinetics of dispersion of the dosage forms into the digestion medium.

conclusionsThis proof of concept study has demonstrated the potential of 3DP for the development of customised S-SMEDDS formulations without the need for an additional carrier or additive and with optimisation could elaborate a new class of dosage forms based on 3D printed lipids. Graphical abstract Lipid based formulations were 3D printed in various shapes to control the surface are to volume ratio and consequently the kinetics of dispersion.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalCinnarizineDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsDrug LiberationFenofibrateKineticsLipidsPolyethylene GlycolsProof of Concept StudySolubilitySurface-Active AgentsWaterCinnarizineDrug CarriersFenofibrategelucire 44-14LipidsPolyethylene GlycolsSurface-Active AgentsWater3D printinggeometrical shapeskinetics of dispersion and digestionsolid self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (S-SMEDDS)surface area to volume ratio value

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.