Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31098750›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2019

Safety and efficacy of aspirin for primary prevention of cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Tarek Haykal, Mahmoud Barbarawi, Yazan Zayed, Anitha Yelangi, Harsukh Dhillon, Sowmya Goranta, Babikir Kheiri, Adam Chahine, Varun Samji, Josiane Kerbage and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meta-analysis of aspirin-guided therapy of colorectal cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Aspirin Use among Saudi Adults: The Prevalence and Users' Characteristics.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Effect of Aspirin on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Older Adults.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tarek HaykalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI, USA. haykaltarek@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8637-7292
Mahmoud BarbarawiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI, USA.
Yazan ZayedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI, USA.
Anitha YelangiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI, USA.
Harsukh DhillonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI, USA.
Sowmya GorantaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI, USA.
Babikir KheiriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI, USA.
Adam ChahineDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI, USA.
Varun SamjiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI, USA.
Josiane KerbageDepartment of Anesthesiology, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Khalil KatatoGenessee Hematology & Oncology, PC, Flint, MI, USA.
Ghassan BachuwaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI, USA.
Hurley Medical Center · USLebanese University · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United States, cancer is the second leading cause of mortality, and millions more battle cancer worldwide. As such, primary prevention of cancer is a major interest globally. Aspirin has been studied as a primary prevention method for multiple diseases, mainly cardiovascular disease and various forms of cancer. The role of aspirin as a primary prevention of cancer is still controversial and may be more beneficial in certain cancers over others. With rapidly surfacing large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying this subject, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspirin as a primary prophylaxis for cancer.

methodsA comprehensive electronic database search was conducted for all RCTs that compared aspirin versus placebo for the prevention of any type of disease, and where cancer incidence or mortality was reported. The primary outcome was cancerrelated mortality. Secondary outcomes were cancer incidence, all-cause mortality, major bleeding, any bleeding and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model at the longest follow-up period.

resultsWe included 16 RCTs with 104,018 total patients, mean age of 60.51 years, mean follow-up of 5.48 years, and a male percentage of 38.72%. We found that aspirin was not associated with a significant reduction of cancer-related mortality compared with placebo (RR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.87-1.12; P = 0.85: I

conclusionOur study did not find any significant reductions in cancer-related mortality or cancer incidence when compared aspirin use with placebo or no aspirin. Our study also highlights that the use of aspirin for primary prevention of cancer was found to cause higher rates of bleeding (any bleeding, major bleeding, and GI bleeding) compared to placebo or no aspirin at the longest follow-up period with no significant benefit in cancer primary prevention.

Indexed as

AspirinHumansNeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAspirinAspirinBleedingCancerPrimary prevention

Identifiers

PMID31098750
PMCPMC11810425
OpenAlexW2945386138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.