Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31098703›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Comparing benign laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy outcomes by time.

Samantha L Margulies, Maria V Vargas, Kathryn Denny, Andrew D Sparks, Cherie Q Marfori, Gaby Moawad, Richard L Amdur

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A randomized, controlled trial comparing the clinical outcomes of 3D versus 2D laparoscopic hysterectomy.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha L MarguliesDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Health Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street FMB 307, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Maria V VargasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2150 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA. mvvargas@mfa.gwu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0971-7553
Kathryn DennyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Andrew D SparksDepartment of Surgery, George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC, USA.
Cherie Q MarforiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2150 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Gaby MoawadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2150 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Richard L AmdurDepartment of Surgery, George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC, USA.
George Washington University · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile laparoscopic hysterectomy has benefits compared to abdominal hysterectomy, the operative times are longer. Longer operative times have been associated with negative outcomes. This study's purpose was to elucidate if there is an operative time at which 30-day outcomes for laparoscopic hysterectomy become inferior to a more expeditiously completed abdominal hysterectomy.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2) using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications from 2010 to 2016 by current procedural terminology code. Hysterectomy cases were stratified by approach and 60-min intervals. 30-day post-operative outcomes were analyzed by operative time and approach.

results109,821 hysterectomies were included in our analysis, of which 66,560 (61%) were laparoscopic, and 43,261 (39%) were abdominal. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis comparing outcomes by surgical approach and operative time, there was no time combination in which patients who had a abdominal hysterectomy had significantly lower odds of the composite complications variable. This was true even in laparoscopic hysterectomies greater than 240 min compared to abdominal hysterectomies completed between 20 and 60 min. When compared to laparoscopic hysterectomies greater than 240 min, abdominal hysterectomies between 20 and 60 min had lower odds of sepsis and abdominal hysterectomies less than 180 min had lower odds of urinary tract infection.

conclusionGiven that benefits persist even in prolonged cases, a laparoscopic approach should be offered to most patients undergoing benign hysterectomy. Surgical efficiency should be prioritized for any surgical approach.

Indexed as

HysterectomyLaparoscopyLaparotomyOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient SelectionQuality ImprovementRetrospective StudiesHysterectomyLaparoscopyMinimally invasive surgeryMorbidityOperative timeSurgical approach

Identifiers

PMID31098703
OpenAlexW2945218048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.