Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31098696›Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2019

Phytosynthesized metal oxide nanoparticles for pharmaceutical applications.

Swetha Andra, Satheesh Kumar Balu, Jaison Jeevanandham, Murugesan Muthalagu, Manisha Vidyavathy, Yen San Chan, Michael Kobina Danquah

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Characterization of FeMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Emerging nanomaterials for antibacterial textile fabrication.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  19. Inorganic Nanoparticles and Composite Films for Antimicrobial Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Swetha AndraDepartment of Textile Technology, Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600025, India.
Satheesh Kumar BaluDepartment of Ceramic Technology, Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600025, India.
Jaison JeevanandhamDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Curtin University, CDT 250, 98009, Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6056-0796
Murugesan MuthalaguDepartment of Textile Technology, Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600025, India.
Manisha VidyavathyDepartment of Ceramic Technology, Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600025, India.
Yen San ChanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Curtin University, CDT 250, 98009, Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Michael Kobina DanquahChemical Engineering Department, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA. michael-danquah@utc.edu.
Anna University, Chennai · INCurtin University Sarawak · MYUniversity of Tennessee at Chattanooga · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developments in nanotechnology field, specifically, metal oxide nanoparticles have attracted the attention of researchers due to their unique sensing, electronic, drug delivery, catalysis, optoelectronics, cosmetics, and space applications. Physicochemical methods are used to fabricate nanosized metal oxides; however, drawbacks such as high cost and toxic chemical involvement prevail. Recent researches focus on synthesizing metal oxide nanoparticles through green chemistry which helps in avoiding the involvement of toxic chemicals in the synthesis process. Bacteria, fungi, and plants are the biological sources that are utilized for the green nanoparticle synthesis. Due to drawbacks such as tedious maintenance and the time needed for the nanoparticle formation, plant extracts are widely used in nanoparticle production. In addition, plants are available all over the world and phytosynthesized nanoparticles show comparatively less toxicity towards mammalian cells. Secondary metabolites including flavonoids, terpenoids, and saponins are present in plant extracts, and these are highly responsible for nanoparticle formation and reduction of toxicity. Hence, this article gives an overview of recent developments in the phytosynthesis of metal oxide nanoparticles and their toxic analysis in various cells and animal models. Also, their possible mechanism in normal and cancer cells, pharmaceutical applications, and their efficiency in disease treatment are also discussed.

Indexed as

Metal NanoparticlesAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalGreen Chemistry TechnologyHumansNanotechnologyPlant ExtractsSurface PropertiesPlant ExtractsCytotoxicityIn vitro analysisMetal oxide nanoparticlesPharmaceutical applicationsPhytochemicals

Identifiers

PMID31098696
OpenAlexW2944994063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.