ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2019
[Dynamic diversity of dermatophytes].
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Arthroderma crocatum on human skin].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2021Review
- Epidemiological Characterization of Dermatomycosis in Ethiopia.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany dermatologists do not understand the perpetual adjustments in the dermatophyte nomenclature.
objectivesThe aim is to explain the background and the development of methods that have led to previous and current changes of dermatophyte taxonomy and to the detection of new dermatophytes.
methodsIn this article we evaluate the recent literature on this topic and our own results in the fields of dermatophyte identification, their detection, and of the associated taxonomic developments.
resultsToday, the phylogenetic species concept is the basis of taxonomic classification, including that of dermatophytes. Genetic techniques have decisively advanced this and are state of the art nowadays. The detection of new dermatophyte species was often triggered by clinical observations and by morphologically conspicuous cultures that prompted their subsequent exact mycological characterization. Even today not all species of dermatophytes are unequivocally defined.
conclusionsBy exclusively using selected genetic characteristics for the construction of phylogenetic trees additional taxonomically relevant features are neglected. Therefore it is necessary to better integrate data derived from morphologic, physiologic, ecologic and pathophysiologic observations into phylogenetic analyses. Dermatologists are still asked to contribute such information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31098690What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.