ArticleExperimental brain research2019
Influence of age on motor control accuracy during static ramp contractions.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deficits in neuromuscular control of increasing force in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Detailed characterization of physiological EMG activations and directional tuning of upper-limb and trunk muscles in point-to-point reaching movements.Current research in physiology · 2021Article
- Feasibility of Cognitive-Motor Exergames in Geriatric Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated the influence of the ageing process on the performance of the motor control system accuracy during a challenging motor task throughout the analysis of force output oscillations. The force signal of the first dorsal interosseous during linearly varying static contraction, 0-100-0% of the maximal volitional abduction in 15 s, was studied in 11 young and older adults. The relative error between the target and the actual force as well as several parameters of the force oscillations (corrections) were estimated. To understand the experimental results, we analyzed the force output generated by a set of computational simulations of a pool of motor units controlled by a proportional-integral-derivative system. Compared to young adults the older subjects presented larger errors and a lower number of corrections with longer duration and larger relative amplitude. The motor control system modelling varied the error update frequency (UF) of the controller (from 1 to 2.5 Hz) as well as the range of contraction time (CT) of the recruited motor unit (30-90 ms and 60-120 ms reflecting young and old ranges, respectively). The simulation generated force profiles with parameters similar to experimental recordings in young (UF = 1.5; CT 30-90 ms) and older (UF = 1; CT 60-120 ms) adults. Interestingly, the results of the simulations suggested that the improvement in the error update frequency of the controller was not able to compensate for the contractile changes in the motor unit twitches. In conclusion, the peripheral contractile changes with age can influence motor unit control strategies and represent a crucial phenomenon in the generation of larger force oscillations in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.