Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31098672›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Diffusion modeling of interference and decay in auditory short-term memory.

Tyler D Bancroft, Tyler M Ensor, William E Hockley, Philip Servos, Jeffery A Jones

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tyler D BancroftDepartment of Psychology, St. Thomas University, Fredericton, NB, E3B 5G3, Canada. bancroft@stu.ca.
Tyler M EnsorDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, A1C 5S7, Canada.
William E HockleyDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3C5, Canada.
Philip ServosDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3C5, Canada.
Jeffery A JonesDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3C5, Canada.

Funding

NSERC N/ASt. Thomas University N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decay and interference are two leading proposals for the cause of forgetting from working and/or short-term memory, and mathematical models of both processes exist. In the present study, we apply a computational model to data from a simple short-term memory task and demonstrate that decay and interference can co-occur in the same experimental paradigm, and that neither decay nor interference alone can account for all cases of forgetting.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAcoustic StimulationAttentionFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermAuditoryDecayDiffusionInterferenceModelShort-term memory

Identifiers

PMID31098672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.