ReviewOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2019
[Lateral ankle ligament bracing].
Review in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Augmented Tendon Repair with Internal Bracing: Surgical Technique.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [Augmented primary sutures "internal bracing" following ligamentous elbow dislocation].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2023Article
- Suture Tape Augmentation in Lateral Ankle Ligament Surgery: Current Concepts Review.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCovering the anatomic reconstruction (Broström procedure) with suture tape for more initial stability. Seat belt principle. INDICATIONS: Mechanical lateral ankle instability: athletes in sports at risk, patients with uncertain compliance with respect to the postoperative treatment regimen, patients with poor tissue quality, patients with generalized laxity, and patients with failed previous repairs. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Known implant intolerance, local or systemic infection, local soft tissue affections, hemorrhagic disorders. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Epimalleolar 5 cm skin incision. Anatomic repair of the lateral capsuloligamentous structures to the anterior facet of the lateral malleolus (e.g. Broström repair). Dissection down to origin and insertion of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL). Close proximal (fibula) and distal (talar neck) to the ATFL attachments to bone a 2.7 mm (fibular) and a 3.4 mm (talar) drill hole is created and taped with the respective tapes from the single use kit (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA). Placement of a 3.5 mm × 15.8 mm BioComposite SwiveLock® screw, preloaded with suture tape into the fibula. The free ends of this suture tape are inserted into a 4.75 mm × 19.1 mm SwiveLock® anchor, which is screwed into the talar drill hole under moderate tension of the suture tapes. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Immobilization for 4-5 days postoperatively in a leg and foot Scotchcast
resultsMeasured with the validated FAAM-G (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-German version) questionnaire, 9 patients had a preoperative activities of daily living subscale median (minimum-maximum) of 65 (30-100) and increased to 98 (78-100) 12 months postoperatively. Preoperative FAAM-G sport subscale results were 35 (0-75) and 100 (19-100) after 12 months. With the Sefton Grading System, 7 of 8 followed patients had an excellent result and had unrestricted ankle mobility and stable ankles (talar tilt and anterior talar drawer), which is comparable to published suture tape augmentation reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.