Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31098626›Full record

ArticleAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Perspective: Advancing Understanding of Population Nutrient-Health Relations via Metabolomics and Precision Phenotypes.

Stephanie Andraos, Melissa Wake, Richard Saffery, David Burgner, Martin Kussmann, Justin O'Sullivan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie AndraosLiggins Institute, Auckland, New Zealand.
Melissa WakeThe Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Richard SafferyThe Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
David BurgnerThe Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Martin KussmannLiggins Institute, Auckland, New Zealand.
Justin O'SullivanLiggins Institute, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet and lifestyle are vital to population health, but their true contribution is difficult to quantify using traditional methods. Nutrient-health relations are typically based on epidemiological associations that are assessed at the population level, traditionally using self-reported dietary and lifestyle data. Unfortunately, such measures are inherently inaccurate. New technologies such as metabolomics can measure nutritional and micronutrient profiles in body fluids, providing objective evaluation of nutritional status. A critical step toward accurate health prediction models would be the building of integrated repositories of nutritional measures combining subjective methods of reporting with objective metabolomics profiles and precise phenotypic data. Here we outline a roadmap to achieve this goal and discuss both the advantages and risks of this approach. We also highlight the uncertain associations between the complexity of high-dimensional data generated in 'omics research (along with the public confusion this may engender) and the rapid adoption of 'omics approaches by nutrition and health companies to develop nutritional products and services.

Indexed as

Health StatusMetabolomicsNutritional StatusPhenotypeAnthropometryDietHumansLife StyleMicronutrientsNutrientsNutrigenomicsNutritional SciencesPrecision MedicineMicronutrientsNutrientshealth statusmetabolomicsnutrition'omics technologiespredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID31098626
PMCPMC6855971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.