ArticleFuture healthcare journal2019
DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY: Opportunities and barriers for usage of personal health records in hospital - report from a -workshop of the Health Informatics Unit at the Royal -College of Physicians.
Article in Future healthcare journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Functionalities and Issues in the Implementation of Personal Health Records: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- A Digital Opportunity for Patients to Manage Their Health: Turkey National Personal Health Record System (The e-Nabız)Balkan medical journal · 2023Observational
- Impact of electronic health records on predefined safety outcomes in patients admitted to hospital: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Do mHealth applications improve clinical outcomes of patients with cancer? A critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed literature.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Personal health records (PHRs) are thought to offer benefits and are promoted by health policy makers and some healthcare systems. Evidence for usage by patients in hospital is limited. This article reports a one-day workshop hosted by the Royal College of Physicians that considered the evidence of the value to patients and others, the challenges to adoption and use of PHRs and sought to identify the practical and research questions that need to be answered. The purpose of this article is to provide readers with an overview of the issues and possible future for hospital application of PHRs in the UK's NHS, especially for supporting self-care, family carers and advancing person-centred care. It aims to share the experience and ideas of those taking part in the workshop and reference resources that we have found useful while highlighting areas for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.