ArticleFuture healthcare journal2018
Paying for what matters most: the future of outcomes-based payments in healthcare.
Article in Future healthcare journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Paying for Health Gains Using Patient Reported Outcome Measures.Health economics · 2026Article
- The financial cost of postoperative complications: a prospective cohort study with linked health systems data.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Leadership Practices, Organization Structure, and Other Factors Associated with Higher 2022-2023 US News and World Report Ranking.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Value-based healthcare analysis of joint replacement surgery for patients with primary hip osteoarthritis.BMJ open quality · 2019Article
- Sustainability in healthcare: efficiency, effectiveness, -economics and the environment.Future healthcare journal · 2018Article
- Health and sustainability.Future healthcare journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Payment by results' (PbR) is probably one of the most widely debated misnomers in the NHS. At best, rather than reimbursing results, it can be considered as payment for providing collections of acute care activities. Better prevention is often cited as the only solution to sustainability, but currencies which reward prevention seemingly remain very hard to create. This review article explores the impact of legacy payment systems on health and care systems nationally and internationally. It examines alternative models, such as payment for outcomes, and questions whether any alternative payment systems may better support prevention, and finally achieve the 'holy grail' of a truly sustainable care system. If payment for outcomes offers a potential solution, then what are the key barriers and enablers? The case for alternative, novel metrics for success is proposed, which may better support care systems to measure their progress towards sustainability than existing indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.