ArticleTranslational neuroscience2019
Difference in the Ascending Reticular Activating System Injury Between Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Cerebral Concussion.
Article in Translational neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The second decade of DTI in TBI part 1: a systematic review of mild TBI.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Analyzing brain-activation responses to auditory stimuli improves the diagnosis of a disorder of consciousness by non-linear dynamic analysis of the EEG.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Hidden Truth in Cerebral Concussion-Traumatic Axonal Injury: A Narrative Mini-Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe investigated differences in the ascending reticular activating system (ARAS) injuries between patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and cerebral concussion by using diffusion tensor tractography (DTT).
methodsThirty-one patients with mTBI, 29 patients with concussion, and 30 control subjects were recruited. We used DTT to reconstruct the lower ventral and dorsal ARAS, and the upper ARAS. The fractional anisotropy (FA) value and the fiber number (FN) of the lower ventral and dorsal ARAS, and the upper ARAS were determined.
resultsSignificant differences were observed in the FA values of the lower ventral and dorsal ARAS on both sides between the mTBI and control groups and between the concussion and control groups (p < 0.05). The FN value was significantly different in the lower ventral ARAS on both sides between the concussion and control groups and between the mTBI and concussion groups (p < 0.05).
conclusionBoth the mTBI and concussion patients suffered injuries in the lower ventral and dorsal ARAS, with the concussion patients exhibiting more severe injury in the ventral ARAS than that in the mTBI patients. These results suggest that the terms mTBI and concussion should be used differentially, even though they have used interchangeably for a long time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.