ArticleFuture hospital journal2017
Untapping the potential of medical trainees to improve the quality of healthcare.
Article in Future hospital journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Now, where are those matches at the end of this tunnel?Future hospital journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Doctors in training have the potential to make important contributions to improving healthcare services, at the same time as developing their own skills and knowledge about quality improvement (QI). However, meaningful improvements in healthcare quality and useful educational experiences for trainees are unlikely to occur unless employers and training organisations develop systematic approaches to involving trainees in QI. Organisations need to provide trainees with the time, resources, mentorship, educational supervision and training in QI methods required for them to carry out QI projects successfully. Focusing the efforts of trainees in tackling high value and strategically important problems, working together as teams rather than as individuals, and learning from and contributing to published QI reports will make it more likely that genuine improvements are achieved and sustained over time. Finally, career pathways should be developed to allow trainees to gain in-depth, specialist knowledge and experience of QI, and work towards becoming the improvement leaders of the future NHS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.