Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31098204›Full record

ArticleFuture hospital journal2016

Delivering person-centred care in long-term conditions.

Simon Eaton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future hospital journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Rehabilitation Workforce Challenges to Implement Person-Centered Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Simon EatonNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The components of supporting people with long-term conditions, and the incumbent skills and resources required, are increasingly well understood. However, more coherent and systematic approaches to delivery across care pathways are -required. In the setting of intermittent, discrete decisions about healthcare, the concept of shared decision making will apply. Support for self-management describes efforts to help people in living day to day with their condition(s). Care planning is relevant to proactively planning cycles of care and increasing involvement in care. The underpinning principles require a different mindset for clinicians and support for people to develop the knowledge, skills and confidence to engage and participate in their health more effectively. Achieving this could provide the holy grail of delivering high-quality care at a population level, which is consistently centred around what is important to each individual person and what they want to achieve.

Indexed as

biopsychosocialcare planningLong-term conditionspatient activation­patient involvementperson-centred careshared decision makingsupport for self-management

Identifiers

PMID31098204
PMCPMC6465836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.