Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31098177›Full record

ArticleFuture hospital journal2016

Ensuring a general medicine workforce for the future.

Andrew Goddard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future hospital journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. General practice in crisis - stop skinning the cat!The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Whither or wither the medical registrar?Future hospital journal · 2017
    Article
  4. The future physician.Future hospital journal · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrew GoddardRoyal College of Physicians London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acute hospital system in the NHS is in crisis, with the rising demands of treating elderly comorbid patients and limited financial and workforce resources. An increase in the workforce trained in and delivering general medical services seven days per week has been proposed as a solution to this crisis. The current trainee and consultant workforce is unable to provide this increase because of imbalances between training and service delivery, the different demands of large and small hospitals and the need to simultaneously provide high-quality specialised services. The demographics of the NHS medical workforce are also changing, which will limit expansion. It is very unlikely that a generalist workforce can be achieved in less than 10 years without a clear governmental strategy and increased staffing levels, both of which seem unlikely at present.

Indexed as

flexible workinggeneral internal medicinegeneralismWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID31098177
PMCPMC6465850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.