Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31098098›Full record

ArticleFuture hospital journal2015

Towards integrated person-centred healthcare - the Canterbury journey.

Carolyn Gullery, Greg Hamilton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future hospital journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Predictors of Residential Care Admission in Community-Dwelling Older People With Dementia.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2020
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Integrated Care in Aotearoa New Zealand 2008-2020.International journal of integrated care
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carolyn GulleryPlanning and Funding, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Greg HamiltonPlanning and Funding, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Canterbury District Health Board (DHB) is the second largest by population (over half a million people) and by geographical area of the 20 DHBs in New Zealand, which were established in 2000. The DHB directly employs over 9,500 staff, and a similar number work in non-governmental sector and private based DHB-funded health services, which includes general practice. The DHB is government funded to plan the strategic direction for health and disability services in Canterbury; fund the majority of health and disability services provided in Canterbury; provide health and disability services primarily for the population of Canterbury but also extensive tertiary services for the South Island and, in some cases, for residents of the lower North Island; and promote, protect and improve the health and wellbeing of the Canterbury population.

Indexed as

clinical leadershipIntegrated careoutcomesplanningwhole of system

Identifiers

PMID31098098
PMCPMC6460205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.