ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2019
Robocasting of Bioactive SiO
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Additively Manufactured Zirconia for Dental Applications with3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024Article
- A Review on Manufacturing Processes of Biocomposites Based on Poly(α-Esters) and Bioactive Glass Fillers for Bone Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Mechanical Properties of Robocast Glass Scaffolds Assessed through Micro-CT-Based Finite Element Models.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Robocasting of advanced ceramics: ink optimization and protocol to predict the printing parameters - A review.Heliyon · 2022Review
- In Vivo Evaluation of 3D-Printed Silica-Based Bioactive Glass Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Dissolution of Amorphous S53P4 Glass Scaffolds in Dynamic In Vitro Conditions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Biological Evaluation of a New Sodium-Potassium Silico-Phosphate Glass for Bone Regeneration: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Silica-Based Bioactive Glasses and Their Applications in Hard Tissue Regeneration: A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A cost effective SiOProgress in biomaterials · 2020Article
- 3D Printing of Hierarchical Scaffolds Based on Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses (MBGs)-Fundamentals and Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Dolomite-Foamed Bioactive Silicate Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Repair.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Comparison Between Bioactive Sol-Gel and Melt-Derived Glasses/Glass-Ceramics Based on the Multicomponent SiOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Robocasting of SiOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Bread-Derived Bioactive Porous Scaffolds: An Innovative and Sustainable Approach to Bone Tissue Engineering.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioactive silicate glass scaffolds were fabricated by a robocasting process in which all the movements of the printing head were programmed by compiling a script (text file). A printable ink made of glass powder and Pluronic F-127, acting as a binder, was extruded to obtain macroporous scaffolds with a grid-like three-dimensional structure. The scaffold architecture was investigated by scanning electron microscopy and microtomographic analysis, which allowed quantifying the microstructural parameters (pore size 150-180
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.