ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2019
Genetic Polymorphisms and Cytokine Profile of Different Ethnicities inSeptic Shock Patients and their Association with Mortality.
Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- IL-6 Baseline Values and Dynamic Changes in Predicting Sepsis Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomolecules · 2025Pooled it
- The relationship between antithrombin administration and inflammation during veno-venous ECMO.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Basal procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and presepsin for prediction of mortality in critically ill septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2023Review
- Human Plasma Proteome During Normal Pregnancy.Journal of proteome research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe outcomes of sepsis and septic shock patients are heterogonous, with avariable response despite standardized care. The aim of this study was toexplore the racial differences in septic shock outcomes, and theirassociation with genetic polymorphisms and cytokine levels in an Asianpopulation. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was an observational cohort study with Intensive Care units of a 500bedded tertiary care hospital in Singapore. 198 patients (73 Chinese, 73Malay and 52 Indian and others) admitted to the Khoo Teck Puat HospitalIntensive Care Unit between August 2016 and June 2017, with a diagnosis ofsevere sepsis (according to) were enrolled. Plasma interlukin-6 (IL-6),interlukin-10 (IL-10) and tumour necrosis factor-a (TNFa) were measuredusing a highly sensitive quantitative sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbentassay (ELISA) (BioVendor, Modrice, Czech Republic). The gene panel studiedincluded 16 genes.
resultsThe rs7038903 common variant in SVEP1 gene showed significant associationwith sepsis severity independent of other variants in ordinal logistic andlinear regression model (
conclusionOur study shows a promising polymorphism in SVEP1 gene (rs7038903) which isassociated with sepsis shock and 28 days mortality, independent of age, gender, and method of diagnosis and SOFA score. Collectively, while our findings so far have shown the additional value or measuring cytokines andgenetic markers in sepsis outcomes in the local population, further largescare studies are needed in a heterogeneous septic population with arigorous analysis to know the significance of our findings. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Siddiqui S, Gurung RL
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.