ArticleScandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications2015
Empirical Likelihood for Censored Linear Regression and Variable Selection.
Article in Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust estimation and bias-corrected empirical likelihood in generalized linear models with right censored data.Journal of applied statistics · 2024Article
- Penalized Empirical Likelihood for the Sparse Cox Regression Model.Journal of statistical planning and inference · 2019Article
- Empirical Likelihood Approaches to Two-Group Comparisons of Upper Quantiles Applied to Biomedical Data.Statistics in biopharmaceutical research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The linear regression model for right censored data, also known as the accelerated failure time model using the logarithm of survival time as the response variable, is a useful alternative to the Cox proportional hazards model. Empirical likelihood as a nonparametric approach has been demonstrated to have many desirable merits thanks to its robustness against model misspecification. However, the linear regression model with right censored data cannot directly benefit from the empirical likelihood for inferences mainly due to dependent elements in estimating equations of the conventional approach. In this paper, we propose an empirical likelihood approach with a new estimating equation for linear regression with right censored data. A nested coordinate algorithm with majorization is used for solving the optimization problems with nondifferentiable objective function. We show that the Wilks theorem holds for the new empirical likelihood. We also consider the variable selection problem with empirical likelihood when the number of predictors can be large. Since the new estimating equation is nondifferentiable, a quadratic approximation is applied to study the asymptotic properties of penalized empirical likelihood. We prove the oracle properties and evaluate the properties with simulated data. We apply our method to a SEER small intestine cancer dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.