Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31097702›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Host diet and evolutionary history explain different aspects of gut microbiome diversity among vertebrate clades.

Nicholas D Youngblut, Georg H Reischer, William Walters, Nathalie Schuster, Chris Walzer, Gabrielle Stalder, Ruth E Ley, Andreas H Farnleitner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 304 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
304citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
23.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

304 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 600 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Gut microbiota promote early-life digestive function in songbirds.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

244 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicholas D YoungblutDepartment of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Max Planck Ring 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. nyoungblut@tuebingen.mpg.de.
Georg H ReischerTU Wien, Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, Research Group for Environmental Microbiology and Molecular Diagnostics 166/5/3, Gumpendorfer Straße 1a, 1060, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3962-8685
William WaltersDepartment of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Max Planck Ring 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Nathalie SchusterTU Wien, Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, Research Group for Environmental Microbiology and Molecular Diagnostics 166/5/3, Gumpendorfer Straße 1a, 1060, Vienna, Austria.
Chris WalzerResearch Institute of Wildlife Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, 1160, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0437-5147
Gabrielle StalderResearch Institute of Wildlife Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, 1160, Austria.
Ruth E LeyDepartment of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Max Planck Ring 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas H FarnleitnerTU Wien, Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, Research Group for Environmental Microbiology and Molecular Diagnostics 166/5/3, Gumpendorfer Straße 1a, 1060, Vienna, Austria.
Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology · DETU Wien · ATUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23900EPA EP-D-15-016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple factors modulate microbial community assembly in the vertebrate gut, though studies disagree as to their relative contribution. One cause may be a reliance on captive animals, which can have very different gut microbiomes compared to their wild counterparts. To resolve this disagreement, we analyze a new, large, and highly diverse animal distal gut 16 S rRNA microbiome dataset, which comprises 80% wild animals and includes members of Mammalia, Aves, Reptilia, Amphibia, and Actinopterygii. We decouple the effects of host evolutionary history and diet on gut microbiome diversity and show that each factor modulates different aspects of diversity. Moreover, we resolve particular microbial taxa associated with host phylogeny or diet and show that Mammalia have a stronger signal of cophylogeny. Finally, we find that environmental filtering and microbe-microbe interactions differ among host clades. These findings provide a robust assessment of the processes driving microbial community assembly in the vertebrate intestine.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBiological EvolutionAnimalsDatasets as TopicFeeding BehaviorGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHost Microbial InteractionsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SVertebratesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31097702
PMCPMC6522487
OpenAlexW2952710254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.