Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31097671›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2019

Simultaneous Improvement in the Precision, Accuracy, and Robustness of Label-free Proteome Quantification by Optimizing Data Manipulation Chains.

Jing Tang, Jianbo Fu, Yunxia Wang, Yongchao Luo, Qingxia Yang, Bo Li, Gao Tu, Jiajun Hong, Xuejiao Cui, Yuzong Chen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The miRNA: a small but powerful RNA for COVID-19.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic Variation Prediction: A Summary From Different Views.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jing Tang‡College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; §School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China; ¶Department of Bioinformatics, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Jianbo Fu‡College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Yunxia Wang‡College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Yongchao Luo‡College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Qingxia Yang‡College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; §School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China.
Bo Li§School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China.
Gao Tu‡College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; §School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China.
Jiajun Hong‡College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Xuejiao Cui§School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China.
Yuzong Chen‖Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
Lixia Yao**Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN 55905, United States.
Weiwei Xue§School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China.
Feng Zhu‡College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; §School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China. Electronic address: zhufeng@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The label-free proteome quantification (LFQ) is multistep workflow collectively defined by quantification tools and subsequent data manipulation methods that has been extensively applied in current biomedical, agricultural, and environmental studies. Despite recent advances, in-depth and high-quality quantification remains extremely challenging and requires the optimization of LFQs by comparatively evaluating their performance. However, the evaluation results using different criteria (precision, accuracy, and robustness) vary greatly, and the huge number of potential LFQs becomes one of the bottlenecks in comprehensively optimizing proteome quantification. In this study, a novel strategy, enabling the discovery of the LFQs of simultaneously enhanced performance from thousands of workflows (integrating 18 quantification tools with 3,128 manipulation chains), was therefore proposed. First, the feasibility of achieving simultaneous improvement in the precision, accuracy, and robustness of LFQ was systematically assessed by collectively optimizing its multistep manipulation chains. Second, based on a variety of benchmark datasets acquired by various quantification measurements of different modes of acquisition, this novel strategy successfully identified a number of manipulation chains that simultaneously improved the performance across multiple criteria. Finally, to further enhance proteome quantification and discover the LFQs of optimal performance, an online tool (https://idrblab.org/anpela/) enabling collective performance assessment (from multiple perspectives) of the entire LFQ workflow was developed. This study confirmed the feasibility of achieving simultaneous improvement in precision, accuracy, and robustness. The novel strategy proposed and validated in this study together with the online tool might provide useful guidance for the research field requiring the mass-spectrometry-based LFQ technique.

Indexed as

ProteomeProteomicsSoftwareWorkflowProteomeBioinformaticsBioinformatics softwareClinical proteomicsLabel-free proteome quantificationLabel-free quantificationLFQ workflowOmicsOnline toolProcessing chainQuantification toolSWATH-MS

Identifiers

PMID31097671
PMCPMC6682996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.