Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31097661›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2019

Identification of a regeneration-organizing cell in the

C Aztekin, T W Hiscock, J C Marioni, J B Gurdon, B D Simons, J Jullien

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Commensal skin bacteria interact with the innate immune system to promote tail regeneration in Xenopus laevis tadpoles.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Putative muscle stem cells promoteProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C Aztekin *Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6544-9752
T W Hiscock *Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0319-8679
J C MarioniCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9092-0852
J B GurdonWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
B D SimonsWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. jj256@gurdon.cam.ac.uk bds10@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3875-7071
J JullienWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. jj256@gurdon.cam.ac.uk bds10@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7868-0021
University of Cambridge · GBEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBWellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 22231Cancer Research UK A14492Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009Medical Research Council MR/P000479/1Wellcome Trust 092096Wellcome Trust 098357Wellcome Trust 101050Wellcome Trust 105031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike mammals,

Indexed as

AnimalsEpidermal CellsEpidermisRe-EpithelializationSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisTailTranscriptomeXenopus laevisXenopus ProteinsXenopus Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31097661
PMCPMC6986927
OpenAlexW2946771864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.