ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019
Circumventing kinetics in biogeochemical modeling.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Activation energies of both constructive and destructive cellular biochemistry determine maximum growth temperature in archaea.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Investigating the activity of indigenous microbial communities from Italian depleted gas reservoirs and their possible impact on underground hydrogen storage.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Functional convergence in slow-growing microbial communities arises from thermodynamic constraints.The ISME journal · 2023Article
- Metabolomics as an Emerging Tool in the Search for Astrobiologically Relevant Biomarkers.Astrobiology · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial metabolism drives biogeochemical fluxes in virtually every ecosystem. Modeling these fluxes is challenged by the incredible diversity of microorganisms, whose kinetic parameters are largely unknown. In poorly mixed systems, such as stagnant water columns or sediments, however, long-term bulk microbial metabolism may become limited by physical transport rates of substrates across space. Here we mathematically show that under these conditions, biogeochemical fluxes are largely predictable based on the system's transport properties, chemical boundary conditions, and the stoichiometry of metabolic pathways, regardless of the precise kinetics of the resident microorganisms. We formalize these considerations into a predictive modeling framework and demonstrate its use for the Cariaco Basin subeuphotic zone, one of the largest anoxic marine basins worldwide. Using chemical concentration data solely from the upper boundary (depth 180 m) and lower boundary (depth 900 m), but without a priori knowledge of metabolite fluxes, chemical depth profiles, kinetic parameters, or microbial species composition, we predict the concentrations and vertical fluxes of biologically important substances, including oxygen, nitrate, hydrogen sulfide, and ammonium, across the entire considered depth range (180-900 m). Our predictions largely agree with concentration measurements over a period of 14 years ([Formula: see text] = 0.78-0.92) and become particularly accurate during a period where the system was near biogeochemical steady state (years 2007-2009, [Formula: see text] = 0.86-0.95). Our work enables geobiological predictions for a large class of ecosystems without knowledge of kinetic parameters or geochemical depth profiles. Conceptually, our work provides a possible explanation for the decoupling between microbial species composition and bulk metabolic function, observed in various ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.