Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31097487›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Do hospital pressures change following rotavirus vaccine introduction? A retrospective database analysis in a large paediatric hospital in the UK.

Ellen Heinsbroek, Daniel Hungerford, Richard P D Cooke, Margaret Chowdhury, James S Cargill, Naor Bar-Zeev, Neil French, Eleni Theodorou, Baudouin Standaert, Nigel A Cunliffe

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03271593 (Impact of Rotavirus Vaccination on Hospital Pressures at a Large Paediatric Hospital in the UK), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03271593 completednot on this map

Impact of Rotavirus Vaccination on Hospital Pressures at a Large Paediatric Hospital in the UK: an Ecological Study

TypeobservationalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2015 to 2016Enrolled1ConditionsGastroenteritisArmsNo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ellen HeinsbroekCentre for Global Vaccine Research, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, members of Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK.
Daniel HungerfordCentre for Global Vaccine Research, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, members of Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9770-0163
Richard P D CookeAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, members of Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK.
Margaret ChowdhuryAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, members of Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK.
James S CargillAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, members of Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK.
Naor Bar-ZeevInternational Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Neil FrenchCentre for Global Vaccine Research, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, members of Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK.
Eleni TheodorouHealth Economics, GSK, London, UK.
Baudouin StandaertHealth Economics, GSK, Wavre, Belgium.
Nigel A CunliffeCentre for Global Vaccine Research, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, members of Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHospitals in the UK are under increasing clinical and financial pressures. Following introduction of childhood rotavirus vaccination in the UK in 2013, rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) hospitalisations reduced significantly. We evaluated changes in 'hospital pressures' (demand on healthcare resources and staff) following rotavirus vaccine introduction in a paediatric setting in the UK.

designRetrospective hospital database analysis between July 2007 and June 2015.

settingA large paediatric hospital providing primary, secondary and tertiary care in Merseyside, UK.

participantsHospital admissions aged <15 years. Outcomes were calculated for four different patient groups identified through diagnosis coding (International Classification of Disease, 10th edition) and/or laboratory confirmation: all admissions; any infection, acute gastroenteritis and RVGE.

methodsHospital pressures were compared before and after rotavirus vaccine introduction: these included bed occupancy, hospital-acquired infection rate, unplanned readmission rate and outlier rate (medical patients admitted to surgical wards due to lack of medical beds). Interrupted time-series analysis was used to evaluate changes in bed occupancy.

resultsThere were 116 871 admissions during the study period. Lower bed occupancy in the rotavirus season in the postvaccination period was observed for RVGE (-89%, 95% CI 73% to 95%), acute gastroenteritis (-63%, 95% CI 39% to 78%) and any infection (-23%, 95% CI 15% to 31%). No significant overall reduction in bed occupancy was observed (-4%, 95% CI -1% to 9%). No changes were observed for the other outcomes.

conclusionsRotavirus vaccine introduction was not associated with reduced hospital pressures. A reduction in RVGE hospitalisation without change in overall bed occupancy suggests that beds available were used for a different patient population, possibly reflecting a previously unmet need. TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03271593.

Indexed as

Rotavirus InfectionsAdolescentBed OccupancyChildChild, PreschoolCross InfectionFemaleGastroenteritisHospitalizationHospitals, PediatricHumansInfantInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMaleRetrospective StudiesRotavirus VaccinesRotavirus Vaccinesepidemiologyhospitalnosocomial infectionsquality in health carerotavirus

Identifiers

PMID31097487
PMCPMC6530452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.