ArticleThe American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry2019
Understanding Aging in Bipolar Disorder by Integrating Archival Clinical Research Datasets.
Article in The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Demographic and Clinical Correlates of Body Mass Index in Older Age Bipolar Disorder: Results from the GAGE-BD Project.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Demographic and clinical associations to employment status in older-age bipolar disorder: Analysis from the GAGE-BD database project.Bipolar disorders · 2023Article
- Bipolar Disorder Among Older Adults: Newer Evidence to Guide Clinical Practice.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2023Article
- Bipolar symptoms, somatic burden, and functioning in older-age bipolar disorder: Analyses from the Global Aging & Geriatric Experiments in Bipolar Disorder Database project.Bipolar disorders · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAlthough 25% of people with bipolar disorder (BD) are over age 60, there is a dearth of research on older age bipolar disorder (OABD). This report describes an initial effort to create an integrated OABD database using the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive (NDA). Goals were to: 1) combine data from three BD studies in the United States that included overlapping data elements; 2) investigate research questions related to aims of the original studies; and 3) take an important first step toward combining existing datasets relevant to aging and BD.
methodsData were prepared and uploaded to the NDA, with a focus on data elements common to all studies. As appropriate, data were harmonized to select or collapse categories suitable for cross-walk analysis. Associations between age, BD symptoms, functioning, medication load, medication adherence, and medical comorbidities were assessed. The total sample comprised 451 individuals, mean age 57.7 (standard deviation: 13.1) years.
resultsMedical comorbidity was not significantly associated with either age or functioning and there did not appear to be an association between medication load, comorbidity, age, and adherence. Men and African-Americans were significantly more likely to have poor adherence. Both BD mania and depression symptoms were associated with functioning, but this differed across studies.
conclusionDespite limitations including heterogeneity in study design and samples and cross-sectional methodology, integrated datasets represent an opportunity to better understand how aging may impact the presentation and evolution of chronic mental health disorders across the lifespan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.