Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31096987›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2019

Association of cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived circumferential strain parameters with the risk of ventricular arrhythmia and all-cause mortality in patients with prior myocardial infarction and primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Elisabeth H M Paiman, Alexander F A Androulakis, Rahil Shahzad, Qian Tao, Katja Zeppenfeld, Hildo J Lamb, Rob J van der Geest

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Myocardial strain assessment using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in recipients of implantable cardioverter defibrillators.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elisabeth H M PaimanDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, postal zone C2-S, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. E.H.M.Paiman@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-8948-7860
Alexander F A AndroulakisDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, postal zone C2-S, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rahil ShahzadLKEB, Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, postal zone C2-S, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Qian TaoLKEB, Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, postal zone C2-S, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Katja ZeppenfeldDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, postal zone C2-S, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hildo J LambDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, postal zone C2-S, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rob J van der GeestLKEB, Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, postal zone C2-S, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImpaired left ventricular (LV) contraction and relaxation may further promote adverse remodeling and may increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in ischemic cardiomyopathy. We aimed to examine the association of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived circumferential strain parameters for LV regional systolic function, LV diastolic function and mechanical dispersion with the risk of VA in patients with prior myocardial infarction and primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).

methodsPatients with an ischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent CMR prior to primary prevention ICD implantation, were retrospectively identified. LV segmental circumferential strain curves were extracted from short-axis cine CMR. For LV regional strain analysis, the extent of moderately and severely impaired strain (percentage of LV segments with strain between - 10% and - 5% and > - 5%, respectively) were calculated. LV diastolic function was quantified by the early and late diastolic strain rate. Mechanical dispersion was defined as the standard deviation in delay time between each strain curve and the patient-specific reference curve. Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR) (95%CI) were calculated to assess the association between LV strain parameters and appropriate ICD therapy.

resultsA total of 121 patients (63 ± 11 years, 84% men, LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 27 ± 9%) were included. During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 47 (27;69) months, 30 (25%) patients received appropriate ICD therapy. The late diastolic strain rate (HR 1.1 (1.0;1.2) per - 0.25 1/s, P = 0.043) and the extent of moderately impaired strain (HR 1.5 (1.0;2.2) per + 10%, P = 0.048) but not the extent of severely impaired strain (HR 0.9 (0.6;1.4) per + 10%, P = 0.685) were associated with appropriate ICD therapy, independent of LVEF, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) scar border size and acute revascularization. Mechanical dispersion was not related to appropriate ICD therapy (HR 1.1 (0.8;1.6) per + 25 ms, P = 0.464).

conclusionsIn an ischemic cardiomyopathy population referred for primary prevention ICD implantation, the extent of moderately impaired strain and late diastolic strain rate were associated with the risk of appropriate ICD therapy, independent of LVEF, scar border size and acute revascularization. These findings suggest that disturbed LV contraction and relaxation may contribute to an increased risk of VA after myocardial infarction.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantableMagnetic Resonance ImagingVentricular Function, LeftAgedArrhythmias, CardiacElectric CountershockFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPredictive Value of TestsPrimary PreventionRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsCircumferential strainIschemic cardiomyopathyMagnetic resonanceVentricular arrhythmia

Identifiers

PMID31096987
PMCPMC6521513
OpenAlexW2947607569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.