Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31096906›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

HOME: a histogram based machine learning approach for effective identification of differentially methylated regions.

Akanksha Srivastava, Yuliya V Karpievitch, Steven R Eichten, Justin O Borevitz, Ryan Lister

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Uncovering alterations in cancer epigenetics via trans-dimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo and hidden Markov models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. New Perspectives on the Importance of Cell-Free DNA Biology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Extending the Genotype inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  18. A Practical Guide to the Measurement and Analysis of DNA Methylation.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Akanksha SrivastavaARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Yuliya V KarpievitchARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Steven R EichtenARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Justin O BorevitzARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Ryan ListerARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. ryan.lister@uwa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6637-7239
Australian National University · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUHarry Perkins Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Australian Research Council CE140100008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of whole genome bisulfite sequencing has made it possible to identify methylation differences at single base resolution throughout an entire genome. However, a persistent challenge in DNA methylome analysis is the accurate identification of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) between samples. Sensitive and specific identification of DMRs among different conditions requires accurate and efficient algorithms, and while various tools have been developed to tackle this problem, they frequently suffer from inaccurate DMR boundary identification and high false positive rate.

resultsWe present a novel Histogram Of MEthylation (HOME) based method that takes into account the inherent difference in the distribution of methylation levels between DMRs and non-DMRs to discriminate between the two using a Support Vector Machine. We show that generated features used by HOME are dataset-independent such that a classifier trained on, for example, a mouse methylome training set of regions of differentially accessible chromatin, can be applied to any other organism's dataset and identify accurate DMRs. We demonstrate that DMRs identified by HOME exhibit higher association with biologically relevant genes, processes, and regulatory events compared to the existing methods. Moreover, HOME provides additional functionalities lacking in most of the current DMR finders such as DMR identification in non-CG context and time series analysis. HOME is freely available at https://github.com/ListerLab/HOME .

conclusionHOME produces more accurate DMRs than the current state-of-the-art methods on both simulated and biological datasets. The broad applicability of HOME to identify accurate DMRs in genomic data from any organism will have a significant impact upon expanding our knowledge of how DNA methylation dynamics affect cell development and differentiation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningAnimalsComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticDNA MethylationMiceMolecular Sequence AnnotationTime FactorsDMR identificationDNA methylationEpigeneticsSVMWhole genome bisulfite sequencing

Identifiers

PMID31096906
PMCPMC6521357
OpenAlexW2949570635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.