Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31096736›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2020

Magnetic Resonance-Based Texture Analysis Differentiating KRAS Mutation Status in Rectal Cancer.

Ji Eun Oh, Min Ju Kim, Joohyung Lee, Bo Yun Hur, Bun Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Ji Yeon Baek, Hee Jin Chang, Sung Chan Park, Jae Hwan Oh and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The Role of Radiomics in Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Rectal MRI Interpretation After Neoadjuvant Therapy.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ji Eun OhInnovative Medical Engineering & Technology, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Min Ju KimCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Joohyung LeeInnovative Medical Engineering & Technology, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Bo Yun HurCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Bun KimCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Dae Yong KimCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Ji Yeon BaekCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Hee Jin ChangCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Sung Chan ParkCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Jae Hwan OhCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Sun Ah ChoInnovative Medical Engineering & Technology, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Dae Kyung SohnInnovative Medical Engineering & Technology, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
National Cancer Center · KR

Funding

National Cancer Center NCC-1710070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMutation of the Kirsten Ras (KRAS) oncogene is present in 30%-40% of colorectal cancers and has prognostic significance in rectal cancer. In this study, we examined the ability of radiomics features extracted from T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images to differentiate between tumors with mutant KRAS and wild-type KRAS. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty patients with primary rectal cancer (25 with mutant KRAS, 35 with wild-type KRAS) were retrospectively enrolled. Texture analysis was performed in all regions of interest on MR images, which were manually segmented by two independent radiologists. We identified potentially useful imaging features using the two-tailed t test and used them to build a discriminant model with a decision tree to estimate whether KRAS mutation had occurred.

resultsThree radiomic features were significantly associated with KRASmutational status (p < 0.05). The mean (and standard deviation) skewness with gradient filter value was significantly higher in the mutant KRAS group than in the wild-type group (2.04±0.94 vs. 1.59±0.69). Higher standard deviations for medium texture (SSF3 and SSF4) were able to differentiate mutant KRAS (139.81±44.19 and 267.12±89.75, respectively) and wild-type KRAS (114.55±29.30 and 224.78±62.20). The final decision tree comprised three decision nodes and four terminal nodes, two of which designated KRAS mutation. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the decision tree was 84%, 80%, and 81.7%, respectively.

conclusionUsing MR-based texture analysis, we identified three imaging features that could differentiate mutant from wild-type KRAS. T2-weighted images could be used to predict KRAS mutation status preoperatively in patients with rectal cancer.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMutationAgedClinical Decision-MakingDecision TreesFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Rectal NeoplasmsROC CurveKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)KRAS geneMagnetic resonance imagingRectal neoplasmsTexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID31096736
PMCPMC6962487
OpenAlexW2943930710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.