Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31096607›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019

Machine Learning Application for Rupture Risk Assessment in Small-Sized Intracranial Aneurysm.

Heung Cheol Kim, Jong Kook Rhim, Jun Hyong Ahn, Jeong Jin Park, Jong Un Moon, Eun Pyo Hong, Mi Ran Kim, Seung Gyu Kim, Seong Hwan Lee, Jae Hoon Jeong and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Systematic Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Intracranial Aneurysm Management.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Heung Cheol KimDepartment of Radiology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon 24252, Korea. khc@hallym.or.kr.
Jong Kook RhimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju 63241, Korea. pedineur@daum.net.
Jun Hyong AhnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon 24252, Korea. sparkahn@naver.com.
Jeong Jin ParkDepartment of Neurology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul 05030, Korea. medicalstory@gmail.com.
Jong Un MoonDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Medical Center, Seoul 04564, Korea. nsdocmoon@gmail.com.
Eun Pyo HongMolecular Neurogenetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA. ephong0305@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7789-686X
Mi Ran KimBuzzpole Inc., Seoul 04781, Korea. ran@buzzpole.com.
Seung Gyu KimBuzzpole Inc., Seoul 04781, Korea. seung@buzzpole.com.
Seong Hwan LeeBuzzpole Inc., Seoul 04781, Korea. usim@buzzpole.com.
Jae Hoon JeongBuzzpole Inc., Seoul 04781, Korea. jman@buzzpole.com.
Sung Won ChoiBuzzpole Inc., Seoul 04781, Korea. wociety@buzzpole.com.
Jin Pyeong JeonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon 24252, Korea. jjs6553@daum.net.
Hallym University · KRJeju National University · KRKonkuk University Medical Center · KRMassachusetts General Hospital · USNational Medical Center · KR

Funding

Hallym University Medical Center 2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of rupture probability is crucial to identifying at risk intracranial aneurysms (IA) in patients harboring multiple aneurysms. We aimed to develop a computer-assisted detection system for small-sized aneurysm ruptures using a convolutional neural network (CNN) based on images of three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography. A retrospective data set, including 368 patients, was used as a training cohort for the CNN using the TensorFlow platform. Aneurysm images in six directions were obtained from each patient and the region-of-interest in each image was extracted. The resulting CNN was prospectively tested in 272 patients and the sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were compared to a human evaluator. Our system showed a sensitivity of 78.76% (95% CI: 72.30%-84.30%), a specificity of 72.15% (95% CI: 60.93%-81.65%), and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 76.84% (95% CI: 71.36%-81.72%) in aneurysm rupture predictions. The area under the ROC (AUROC) in the CNN was 0.755 (95% CI: 0.699%-0.805%), better than that obtained from a human evaluator (AUROC: 0.537;

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkintracranial aneurysmsubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID31096607
PMCPMC6572384
OpenAlexW2946535957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.