ArticleMedicine2019
Percutaneous osteoplasty for the management of a humeral head metastasis: Two case reports.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Percutaneous-Reinforced Osteoplasty: A Review of Emerging Treatment Strategies for Bone Interventions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Percutaneous Osteoplasty for the Management of a Talar Metastasis: A Case Report.Journal of pain research · 2021Article
- Quality of life of patients with proximal humerus metastasis treated with cement spacer.Cancer management and research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationalePercutaneous osteoplasty (POP) has been proved effective to relieve pain in metastases of vertebral, pelvis, and femur. Nevertheless, there are few reports about the effectiveness of POP in the humeral head metastases. In this study, we described 2 patients with humeral head metastases treated with POP in our hospital. PATIENT CONCERNS: Case 1 was a 79-year-old man with vertebral and right humeral head metastasis after radical surgery or and periods of chemotherapy for bladder cancer. He suffered constant severe back and right shoulder joint pain even if taking much non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Case 2 was a 59-year-old woman with vertebral and right humeral head metastasis from lung cancer. She received regular radiotherapy and took much painkillers to relieve pain. However, the pain could not be relieved any more after 1 month and severely affects sleeping and daily activities. DIAGNOSIS: Both 2 patients were diagnosed as vertebral metastases and right proximal humeral head metastases.
interventionsPOP was performed to treat the right humeral head metastases. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) was performed to treat vertebral metastases. OUTCOMES: After surgery, the patients experienced significant decrease in pain and better motor function. Both patients did not suffer from pulmonary embolism, infection, nerve injury, and bone cement syndrome. LESSONS: For the pain that cannot be relieved by radiotherapy and analgesic drugs, POP is a safe and beneficial minimally invasive procedure that provides immediate and substantial relief from pain for humerus head metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.